• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反移民偏见的惊人政治:政治保守主义如何调节移民种族和宗教对非人化判断的影响。

The surprising politics of anti-immigrant prejudice: How political conservatism moderates the effect of immigrant race and religion on infrahumanization judgements.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):157-170. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12337. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12337
PMID:31364179
Abstract

Attitudes towards immigrants in the United Kingdom are worsening. It has been posited that these attitudes may reflect covert racial and religious prejudices, particularly among conservatives. To investigate this, two studies examined the role that immigrant race (Black/White; Study 1) and immigrant religion (Muslim/non-Muslim; Study 2) played in immigrant infrahumanization judgements, using political conservatism as a moderating variable. There was a moderating effect of political conservatism; however, it was not in the predicted direction. The results of both studies indicated that immigrant race (Black) and immigrant religion (Muslim) predicted greater infrahumanization when political conservatism was low. Conservatives infrahumanized all immigrants equally (and more than liberals), but liberals were more sensitive to racial/religious biases in their evaluations of immigrants.

摘要

英国民众对移民的态度正在恶化。有人提出,这些态度可能反映出隐蔽的种族和宗教偏见,尤其是在保守派中。为了研究这一现象,两项研究考察了移民的种族(黑人/白人;研究 1)和移民的宗教信仰(穆斯林/非穆斯林;研究 2)在将移民非人化判断中的作用,同时将政治保守主义作为一个调节变量。政治保守主义起到了调节作用;然而,其方向并非是预测的方向。两项研究的结果均表明,当政治保守主义程度较低时,移民的种族(黑人)和移民的宗教信仰(穆斯林)会导致更大程度的将移民非人化。保守派同样将所有移民非人化(甚至比自由派更甚),但自由派在评估移民时对种族/宗教偏见更为敏感。

相似文献

1
The surprising politics of anti-immigrant prejudice: How political conservatism moderates the effect of immigrant race and religion on infrahumanization judgements.反移民偏见的惊人政治:政治保守主义如何调节移民种族和宗教对非人化判断的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):157-170. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12337. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Islam, religiosity, and immigrant political action in Western Europe.伊斯兰教、宗教虔诚度与西欧的移民政治行动
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Jan;43:127-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
3
Expectations about system justification predict the ideological gap in attitudes towards immigrants.对系统合理性的期望预测了对移民态度的意识形态差距。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 13;13(1):11309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38347-8.
4
Framing (implicitly) matters: the role of religion in attitudes toward immigrants and Muslims in Denmark.框架(隐含地)很重要:宗教在丹麦人对移民和穆斯林态度中的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Dec;55(6):593-600. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12161. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
5
Religion and the Unmaking of Prejudice toward Muslims: Evidence from a Large National Sample.宗教与消除对穆斯林的偏见:来自全国大规模样本的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0150209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150209. eCollection 2016.
6
Behind the ethnic-civic distinction: Public attitudes towards immigrants' political rights in the Netherlands.族群-公民区分背后:荷兰公众对移民政治权利的态度。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Sep;53:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 16.
7
Southall Black Sisters. Hannana Siddiqui speaks to Rasna Warah.索撒尔黑人姐妹会。汉纳娜·西迪基与拉斯娜·瓦拉交谈。
Manushi. 1994 Jan-Feb(80):20-7.
8
Inglorious glorification and attachment: National and European identities as predictors of anti- and pro-immigrant attitudes.不光彩的美化与依恋:民族和欧洲认同对反移民和支持移民态度的预测作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):569-590. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12280. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
9
[Integration policy and Islam in Belgium].[比利时的融合政策与伊斯兰教]
Rev Eur Migr Int. 1990;6(2):107-22.
10
Does Islam play a role in anti-immigrant sentiment? An experimental approach.伊斯兰教在反移民情绪中起作用吗?一种实验方法。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Sep;53:89-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Group Dominance, System Justification, and Hostile Classism: The Ideological Roots of the Perceived Socioeconomic Humanity Gap That Upholds the Income Gap.群体主导、系统正当化与敌对阶级主义:维系收入差距的感知社会经济人性差距的意识形态根源。
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 Jun 8;36:7. doi: 10.5334/irsp.753. eCollection 2023.
2
Does feeling collective responsibility for intergroup harm lead to infrahumanization?对群体间伤害感到集体责任会导致人性贬低吗?
PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0323292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323292. eCollection 2025.
3
To what extent is research on infrahumanization confounded by intergroup preference?
对非人类化的研究在多大程度上受到群体间偏好的混淆?
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 16;12(4):241348. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241348. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Attribution of undesirable character traits, rather than trait-based dehumanization, predicts punishment decisions.不良性格特征的归因,而非基于特质的非人化,预测惩罚决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):240087. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240087. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Animalistic dehumanisation as a social influence strategy.将人兽化作为一种社会影响策略。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:999959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999959. eCollection 2022.
6
Reduced helping intentions are better explained by the attribution of antisocial emotions than by 'infrahumanization'.减少帮助意愿可以更好地归因于反社会情绪,而不是“去人性化”。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10460-0.
7
Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution.群体间偏好而非去人性化解释了情感归因中的社会偏见。
Cognition. 2021 Nov;216:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104865. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
No convincing evidence outgroups are denied uniquely human characteristics: Distinguishing intergroup preference from trait-based dehumanization.没有令人信服的证据表明外群体被剥夺了独特的人类特征:区分基于特质的去人性化与群体间偏好。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104682. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104682. Epub 2021 Mar 24.