• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者经皮椎体后凸成形术后再骨折风险的机器学习模型的开发与验证

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting the risk of refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in OVCF patients.

作者信息

Tang Wenxiang, Sun Haifu, You Xingyu, Sun Xiao, Liu Tao, Yang Xuming, Lin Fanguo

机构信息

Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09369-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-09369-9
PMID:40952502
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the risk factors for adjacent vertebral refracture after PKP (Percutoneous Kyphoplasty) and to develop a predictive model using the multiple machine learning models to evaluate the impact of various clinical features on postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,942 OVCF patients who underwent PKP between 2018 and 2023. Patients were classified into non-refracture (Group A) and refracture (Group B) groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors. The multiple machine learning models were constructed and validated to predict refracture risk.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 424 (10.75%) experienced adjacent vertebral refracture. Independent risk factors include bone mineral density (BMD), preoperative AVH, the anterior vertebral height restoration rate (AVHRR), and osteoporosis treatment (P < 0.05). The Balanced Bagging model achieved an accuracy of 96.58%, sensitivity of 94.12%, specificity of 96.88%, and an F1 score of approximately 0.8556 in predicting postoperative refracture.

CONCLUSION

The risk of adjacent vertebral refracture after KP is associated with AVHRR, BMD, and osteoporosis treatment. Through a comparison of multiple models, the optimal predictive model, the Balanced Bagging model, was identified. This will aid clinicians in implementing personalized postoperative management, improving patient outcomes, and reducing the likelihood of subsequent surgeries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)后相邻椎体再骨折的危险因素,并使用多种机器学习模型建立预测模型,以评估各种临床特征对术后结果的影响。

方法

对2018年至2023年间接受PKP的3942例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者进行回顾性分析。将患者分为未再骨折组(A组)和再骨折组(B组)。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定独立危险因素。构建并验证多种机器学习模型以预测再骨折风险。

结果

在这些患者中,424例(10.75%)发生了相邻椎体再骨折。独立危险因素包括骨密度(BMD)、术前平均椎体高度(AVH)、椎体前缘高度恢复率(AVHRR)和骨质疏松治疗情况(P<0.05)。平衡装袋模型在预测术后再骨折方面的准确率为96.58%,灵敏度为94.12%,特异度为96.88%,F1分数约为0.8556。

结论

PKP术后相邻椎体再骨折的风险与AVHRR、BMD和骨质疏松治疗有关。通过多种模型比较,确定了最佳预测模型——平衡装袋模型。这将有助于临床医生实施个性化的术后管理,改善患者预后,并降低后续手术的可能性。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting the risk of refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in OVCF patients.预测骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者经皮椎体后凸成形术后再骨折风险的机器学习模型的开发与验证
Eur Spine J. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09369-9.
2
What Risk Factors Are Associated With Recurrent Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures After Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation? A Meta-analysis.经皮椎体强化术后复发性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的相关危险因素有哪些?一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 26;483(8):1528-39. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003430.
3
Risk factor analysis of refracture in the same cemented vertebra after percutaneous kyphoplasty for Kümmell's disease.Kümmell 病经皮椎体后凸成形术后同一固定椎体再骨折的危险因素分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Nov 10;40(2):255-264. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.SPINE23498. Print 2024 Feb 1.
4
Refracture and Morphologic Classification in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures After Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001893.
5
Development and validation of a predictive model for refracture risk in elderly individuals with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective study in China.老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者再骨折风险预测模型的建立与验证:一项中国的回顾性研究
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 May 26;37(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03055-y.
6
Risk factors of vertebral re-fracture after PVP or PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, especially in Eastern Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮椎体后凸成形术(PVP)或经皮椎体成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后椎体再骨折的风险因素,特别是在东亚:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03038-z.
7
Development and validation of a prediction model for new vertebral fracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty.经皮椎体后凸成形术后新发椎体骨折预测模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14931-y.
8
Paraspinal Muscle Fat Infiltration Predicts Vertebral Refracture After Kyphoplasty: Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram Model.
World Neurosurg. 2025 Sep;201:124325. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124325. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
9
Transverse process-pedicle approach versus conventional transpedicular approach in percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.经横突-椎弓根入路与传统经椎弓根入路在经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中的应用比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 22;20(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06173-5.
10
Risk factors for different cement distribution indexes for refracture of operated vertebrae and adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with thoracolumbar compression fracture.胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者经皮椎体成形术后手术椎体及相邻椎体再骨折不同骨水泥分布指数的危险因素
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03033-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors of neurologic deficit after thoracolumbar burst fracture.胸腰椎爆裂骨折后神经功能缺损的危险因素。
Front Neurol. 2025 May 12;16:1542622. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1542622. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk factors for new vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty or percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.经皮椎体成形术或经皮后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后新发椎体骨折的危险因素。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 22;12:1514894. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1514894. eCollection 2025.
3
Factors associated with new fractures in adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折后相邻椎体新发骨折的相关因素。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):6972-6979. doi: 10.62347/WBBN6996. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation and analysis of risk factors for adverse events of the fractured vertebra post-percutaneous kyphoplasty: a retrospective cohort study using multiple machine learning models.经皮椎体后凸成形术后骨折椎体不良事件的危险因素评估与分析:采用多种机器学习模型的回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 18;19(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05062-7.
5
Development of Symptomatic Adjacent and Remote Level Compression Fractures Following Balloon-assisted Kyphoplasty in a Series of 1,318 Patients.在一系列 1318 例患者中,球囊辅助椎体后凸成形术后发生症状性邻近和远处水平压缩骨折的发展。
Pain Physician. 2024 Jul;27(5):333-339.
6
Analysis of adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty: do radiological or surgical features matter?经皮椎体成形术后邻近椎体骨折的分析:影像学或手术特征重要吗?
Eur Spine J. 2024 Apr;33(4):1524-1532. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08092-7. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
7
Establishing a nomogram to predict refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty by logistic regression.通过逻辑回归建立预测经皮椎体后凸成形术后再骨折的列线图。
Front Neuroinform. 2023 Dec 21;17:1304248. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2023.1304248. eCollection 2023.
8
Is there a risk of further displacement of the fractured fragment into the spinal canal in osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures after unilateral PKP? A prospective study.单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)后骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折的骨折碎片是否有进一步向椎管内移位的风险?一项前瞻性研究。
Spine J. 2024 Jun;24(6):1077-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
9
Risk factor analysis of refracture in the same cemented vertebra after percutaneous kyphoplasty for Kümmell's disease.Kümmell 病经皮椎体后凸成形术后同一固定椎体再骨折的危险因素分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Nov 10;40(2):255-264. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.SPINE23498. Print 2024 Feb 1.
10
A nomogram for predicting the risk of new vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty.经皮椎体后凸成形术后新发椎体压缩性骨折风险预测列线图
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Aug 11;28(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01235-y.