Butel-Simoes Lloyd E, Albayati Ammar, Yu Jie, Quirk Thomas, Sritharan Shanathan, French Matthew, Bennetts Joshua D, Ngo Doan T M, Sverdlov Aaron L
Cardiovascular Department, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Newcastle Centre of Excellence in Cardio-Oncology, The University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03151-w.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionised cancer therapy, significantly impacting survival and outcomes by targeting specific signalling pathways that are necessary for tumour survival. Despite their clinical efficacy, TKIs exhibit a complex toxicity profile. Many of the signalling pathways that are targeted by TKIs are shared with normal homeostatic processes, including those responsible for modulating thrombosis and bleeding. The risk profile of thrombosis and bleeding associated with TKIs varies considerably across agents. Multi-kinase inhibitors, particularly those targeting the breakpoint cluster regio-abelson murine leukaemia 1 gene mutation (BCR-ABL) (i.e., nilotinib and ponatinib), significantly elevate arterial thrombotic events. This thrombosis risk is driven by endothelial dysfunction, accelerated atherosclerosis, platelet hyper-reactivity, and impaired fibrinolysis. Similarly, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway inhibition contributes markedly to thrombotic vascular complications by reducing vasodilators like nitric oxide and promoting pro-thrombotic endothelial environments. TKIs targeting the VEGF receptor (VEGFR-TKIs) (i.e., sunitinib and regorafenib) and brutons tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (i.e., ibrutinib), increase bleeding risk through platelet dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and interactions affecting coagulation pathways. Optimal management of these medications encompasses careful baseline cardiovascular and bleeding risk assessments, proactive modification of modifiable risk factors, and vigilant patient monitoring. Prophylactic antithrombotic therapy necessitates cautious individualised evaluation and comprehensive patient monitoring strategies. TKIs exemplify the advancements in precision oncology but necessitate nuanced management of their complex vascular toxicities. A multidisciplinary cardio-oncology approach involving detailed patient education, robust risk stratification, and collaborative clinical management is essential. Future research should aim to clarify TKI-specific haemostatic mechanisms and develop predictive biomarkers, enabling tailored therapeutic strategies to optimise clinical outcomes and reduce adverse events..
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)彻底改变了癌症治疗方式,通过靶向肿瘤生存所必需的特定信号通路,显著影响了患者的生存率和治疗结果。尽管TKIs具有临床疗效,但其毒性谱较为复杂。TKIs所靶向的许多信号通路与正常的稳态过程相同,包括那些负责调节血栓形成和出血的信号通路。与TKIs相关的血栓形成和出血风险在不同药物之间差异很大。多激酶抑制剂,尤其是那些靶向断裂点簇集区-阿贝尔逊鼠白血病1基因突变(BCR-ABL)的抑制剂(即尼洛替尼和波纳替尼),会显著增加动脉血栓形成事件。这种血栓形成风险是由内皮功能障碍、动脉粥样硬化加速、血小板高反应性和纤维蛋白溶解受损所驱动的。同样,血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)通路抑制通过减少一氧化氮等血管舒张剂并促进促血栓形成的内皮环境,对血栓形成性血管并发症有显著影响。靶向VEGF受体的TKIs(VEGFR-TKIs,即舒尼替尼和瑞戈非尼)以及布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂(即伊布替尼),通过血小板功能障碍、血小板减少以及影响凝血途径的相互作用增加出血风险。对这些药物的最佳管理包括仔细的基线心血管和出血风险评估、对可改变风险因素的积极调整以及对患者的密切监测。预防性抗血栓治疗需要谨慎的个体化评估和全面的患者监测策略。TKIs体现了精准肿瘤学的进展,但需要对其复杂的血管毒性进行细致管理。采用多学科心脏肿瘤学方法,包括详细的患者教育、强大的风险分层和协作性临床管理至关重要。未来的研究应旨在阐明TKIs特异性的止血机制并开发预测性生物标志物,从而制定量身定制的治疗策略,以优化临床结果并减少不良事件。