Suppr超能文献

钢板与髓内钉固定治疗腓骨远端骨折:随机对照试验的系统评价和Meta分析

Plate Versus Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Distal Fibula Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Cook Benjamin, Patel Neal H, Nayar Sandeep K

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, London, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):e90130. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90130. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Equipoise exists regarding implant choice for treating unstable distal fibula fractures. This study aimed to compare intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation and plate fixation (PF), considering solely randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic review and meta-analysis of all published RCTs was conducted. The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes were patient-reported functional measures, union rates, complications, revision rates, and cost-effectiveness. The Cochrane risk-of-bias v2.0 tool was used for bias assessment. Five RCTs involving 455 patients (222 with IMN and 233 with PF) were included. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 93 years, with a mean age of 56.4 years. Functional outcomes, measured by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMS), showed no significant differences between IMN and PF at 24 months. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in OMS at one year between studies (mean difference -2.33, 95% CI -10.03 to 5.37, P=0.55). Complication and union rates were similar between the groups. One study suggested cost savings with IMN despite the higher initial implant cost. Some concerns were raised about the risk of bias assessment of all the included studies. IMN and PF provide comparable functional recovery for distal fibula fractures with similar complication profiles. Patient-specific factors should guide the choice of fixation method. IMN may offer cost benefits for certain populations, though further research is needed. Larger longitudinal studies including outcomes such as return to work and sports are recommended to refine clinical guidelines for selecting the appropriate fixation method.

摘要

在治疗不稳定型腓骨远端骨折的植入物选择上存在 equipoise(暂不明确准确中文术语,可理解为“平衡状态”等类似意思)。本研究旨在仅考虑随机对照试验(RCT),比较髓内钉(IMN)固定和钢板固定(PF)。对所有已发表的RCT进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。该研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册。检索了医学文献分析与联机检索系统(MEDLINE)、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和Cochrane数据库。结局指标包括患者报告的功能测量、骨愈合率、并发症、翻修率和成本效益。采用Cochrane偏倚风险v2.0工具进行偏倚评估。纳入了5项RCT,涉及455例患者(222例采用IMN,233例采用PF)。患者年龄范围为18至93岁,平均年龄为56.4岁。以美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分和奥勒鲁德与莫兰德踝关节评分(OMS)衡量的功能结局,在24个月时IMN和PF之间无显著差异。荟萃分析表明,各研究之间在1年时OMS无显著差异(平均差异-2.33,95%CI -10.03至5.37,P = 0.55)。两组之间的并发症和骨愈合率相似。一项研究表明,尽管IMN初始植入成本较高,但可节省成本。对所有纳入研究的偏倚风险评估提出了一些担忧。IMN和PF为腓骨远端骨折提供了类似的功能恢复,并发症情况相似。应根据患者的具体因素指导固定方法的选择。IMN可能对某些人群具有成本效益,不过仍需进一步研究。建议开展更大规模的纵向研究,纳入诸如重返工作和运动等结局指标,以完善选择合适固定方法的临床指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f600/12433576/851c5d0deb56/cureus-0017-00000090130-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验