• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗临床医生对老年慢性疼痛管理及临床决策支持的看法:定性研究

Primary Care Clinician Perspectives on Older Adult Chronic Pain Management and Clinical Decision Support: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Hasnain Isra, Staab Erin M, Kagarmanova Ainur, Mackiewicz Marissa, Ari Mim, Thompson Katherine, Lazar Danielle, Zhao Anne, Elwyn Glyn, Harle Christopher A, Press Valerie G, Laiteerapong Neda

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Section of General Internal Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States, 1 7738342238.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 26;9:e74381. doi: 10.2196/74381.

DOI:10.2196/74381
PMID:40956052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12439314/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain management in older adults can be challenging for primary care clinicians due to comorbidities, side effects, and complicated guideline recommendations. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may improve care by integrating guideline-based recommendations, synthesizing relevant patient data, and facilitating shared decision-making. I-COPE (Improving Chicago Older Adult Opioid and Pain Management through Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support and Project ECHO) is an electronic health record-based CDSS designed to gather patient-reported data and support primary care clinicians in managing chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder in older adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined clinicians' views on challenges in managing chronic pain and their opinions on I-COPE.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 clinicians (16 physicians and 2 advanced practice nurses) from 2 University of Chicago Medicine primary care clinics (internal medicine and geriatrics) piloting the I-COPE CDSSs in 2021. The interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and explored current practices in chronic pain management, challenges, and feedback on I-COPE tools.

RESULTS

Of the 18 participants, 12 (67%) identified as female, 13 (72%) as White, and 9 (50%) had practiced for 10 years or less. Participants stressed the importance of a comprehensive, patient-centered approach to chronic pain management and prioritized multimodal and nonpharmacological treatments. Major barriers to effective chronic pain management were comorbidities, limited visit time, insurance coverage restrictions, and opioid misuse concerns. Most clinicians found the CDSSs beneficial for standardizing multimodal care discussions, enhancing visit efficiency, eliciting patient goals, and facilitating shared decision-making conversations. Clinicians raised concerns about the complexity of the intervention, anticipated issues with clinic workflow, and desired more adaptability. The primary care clinicians in this study demonstrated strong alignment with current pain management guidelines, prioritizing patient-centered pain management using multimodal treatments. They identified I-COPE as a promising tool to reinforce evidence-based practices, increase efficiency, and strengthen patient-clinician communication. However, implementation challenges-particularly around accessibility for older adults, workflow integration, and tool complexity-highlight the need for further refinement and support.

CONCLUSIONS

I-COPE offers a promising approach to support primary care clinicians in providing patient-centered guideline-based chronic pain and opioid management for older adults. Further efforts to improve usability and adaptability for real-world workflows and equitable access for older adults should be prioritized.

摘要

背景

由于存在合并症、副作用以及复杂的指南建议,初级保健临床医生对老年人进行慢性疼痛管理可能具有挑战性。临床决策支持系统(CDSS)可通过整合基于指南的建议、综合相关患者数据以及促进共同决策来改善护理。I-COPE(通过以患者为中心的临床决策支持和项目ECHO改善芝加哥老年人阿片类药物和疼痛管理)是一种基于电子健康记录的CDSS,旨在收集患者报告的数据,并支持初级保健临床医生管理老年人的慢性疼痛、阿片类药物使用及阿片类药物使用障碍。

目的

本研究调查了临床医生对慢性疼痛管理挑战的看法以及他们对I-COPE的意见。

方法

我们对来自芝加哥大学医学中心2个初级保健诊所(内科和老年医学科)的18名临床医生(16名医生和2名高级执业护士)进行了半结构化访谈,这些诊所于2021年试用I-COPE CDSS。访谈指南以实施研究综合框架为依据,探讨了慢性疼痛管理的当前实践、挑战以及对I-COPE工具的反馈。

结果

18名参与者中,12名(67%)为女性,13名(72%)为白人,9名(50%)从业时间为10年或更短。参与者强调了采用全面、以患者为中心的方法进行慢性疼痛管理的重要性,并将多模式和非药物治疗列为优先事项。有效慢性疼痛管理的主要障碍包括合并症、就诊时间有限、保险覆盖限制以及对阿片类药物滥用的担忧。大多数临床医生发现CDSS有助于规范多模式护理讨论、提高就诊效率、引出患者目标并促进共同决策对话。临床医生对干预措施的复杂性、诊所工作流程可能出现的问题表示担忧,并希望其具有更高的适应性。本研究中的初级保健临床医生与当前疼痛管理指南高度一致,优先采用以患者为中心的多模式治疗进行疼痛管理。他们认为I-COPE是一种有前景的工具,可加强循证实践、提高效率并加强医患沟通。然而,实施方面的挑战,尤其是在老年人可及性、工作流程整合和工具复杂性方面,凸显了进一步优化和提供支持的必要性。

结论

I-COPE为支持初级保健临床医生为老年人提供以患者为中心的基于指南的慢性疼痛和阿片类药物管理提供了一种有前景的方法。应优先进一步努力提高其在现实世界工作流程中的可用性和适应性,以及老年人的公平可及性。

相似文献

1
Primary Care Clinician Perspectives on Older Adult Chronic Pain Management and Clinical Decision Support: Qualitative Study.基层医疗临床医生对老年慢性疼痛管理及临床决策支持的看法:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 26;9:e74381. doi: 10.2196/74381.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
4
Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on the Use of AI to Support Clinical Decision-Making in the Management of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: Interview Study.医疗保健专业人员对使用人工智能支持多种慢性病管理中临床决策的看法:访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 4;27:e71980. doi: 10.2196/71980.
5
Can Patient-centered Education and Pain Management Delivered by Coaches Improve Pain Outcomes After Orthopaedic Trauma? A Randomized Trial.教练提供的以患者为中心的教育和疼痛管理能否改善骨科创伤后的疼痛结局?一项随机试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1858-1869. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003121. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
8
Expectations and Requirements of Surgical Staff for an AI-Supported Clinical Decision Support System for Older Patients: Qualitative Study.外科医护人员对用于老年患者的人工智能支持临床决策支持系统的期望与要求:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Dec 17;7:e57899. doi: 10.2196/57899.
9
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
10
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalised decision support in the management of patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary physiotherapy care: a cluster randomised controlled trial (the SupportPrim project).初级物理治疗护理中肌肉骨骼疼痛患者管理的个性化决策支持:一项整群随机对照试验(SupportPrim项目)
Pain. 2025 May 1;166(5):1167-1178. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003456. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations to increase the use of a clinical decision support tool for managing chronic pain in primary care.增加在初级保健中使用临床决策支持工具来管理慢性疼痛的障碍、促进因素和建议。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Dec;192:105649. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105649. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
3
Developing a multimedia patient-reported outcomes measure for low literacy patients with a human-centered design approach.采用以人为中心的设计方法为低识字水平患者开发多媒体患者报告结局测量工具。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 5;19(6):e0304351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304351. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Opioid Prescriptions for Dental Extractions using SMART on FHIR: Implementation Report.使用基于快速医疗互操作性资源(FHIR)的可扩展医疗记录技术(SMART)减少拔牙阿片类药物处方的临床决策支持:实施报告
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Nov 7;11:e45636. doi: 10.2196/45636.
5
Physician perspectives on chronic pain management: barriers and the use of eHealth in the COVID-19 era.医生对慢性疼痛管理的看法:COVID-19 时代的障碍和电子健康的使用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):1131. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10157-8.
6
Treating opioid use disorder in veterans with co-occurring substance use: a qualitative study with buprenorphine providers in primary care, mental health, and pain settings.在同时存在物质使用问题的退伍军人中治疗阿片类药物使用障碍:在初级保健、心理健康和疼痛环境中使用丁丙诺啡的提供者的定性研究。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 May 4;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00382-1.
7
Understanding Older Adults' Experiences With Technologies for Health Self-management: Interview Study.了解老年人使用健康自我管理技术的体验:访谈研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Mar 21;6:e43197. doi: 10.2196/43197.
8
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.美国疾病预防控制中心 2022 年《疼痛阿片类药物处方临床实践指南》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov 4;71(3):1-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1.
9
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
10
Improving the management of chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder in older adults: study protocol for I-COPE study.改善老年人慢性疼痛、阿片类药物使用和阿片类药物使用障碍的管理:I-COPE 研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 27;23(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06537-w.