Throneberry Amie R, Burk Bradley G, Pruett Brandon S
Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Nashville, TN, United States.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 1;16:1659290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1659290. eCollection 2025.
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-APs) are vital for managing psychiatric conditions, particularly in patients with adherence challenges. However, errors in medication reconciliation, prescribing, preparation, and administration, often stemming from documentation lapses and communication breakdowns, may result in an increased risk of relapse or readmission. Despite their widespread use, standardized documentation practices remain underdeveloped.
To identify documentation insufficiencies related to LAI-AP use across healthcare settings and propose best practice recommendations to improve safety and care continuity.
A comprehensive review of literature using PubMed, Google Scholar, current clinical guidelines, and gray literature was conducted to identify safety concerns and documentation gaps related to LAI-APs. Search terms included "LAI antipsychotic medication errors," "documentation," "safety," "mental health," and "medication reconciliation." Further articles were identified through a scan of the references cited within the initial sources. From this analysis, a series of best practice recommendations were developed targeting key aspects of LAI-AP use, with a focus on practical implementation strategies.
Limited literature is available on errors related to LAI-AP with minimal detail on documentation strategies to address these. By reviewing reports, extrapolating recommendations from their oral antipsychotic counterparts, and analyzing potential risk factors unique to the behavioral health setting, key documentation gaps were identified across the LAI-AP use process. These include deficiencies in medication reconciliation-especially related to last doses and oral overlap-along with inconsistencies in prescribing practices, patient education, preparation, administration, and transitions of care. Inadequate documentation contributes to missed or duplicate doses, incorrect administration techniques, and poor coordination between settings. Our findings indicate the need for standardized order sets, readily accessible documentation of initiation or discontinuation reasoning, integration of therapeutic drug monitoring and symptom tracking tools, structured patient education, and formalized transitions of care procedures.
Enhancing documentation throughout the LAI-AP care continuum is crucial to reduce medication errors and improve patient outcomes. The proposed framework offers practical steps for clinicians and health systems to standardize documentation, improve communication during care transitions, and promote safer LAI-AP use. Innovations such as national electronic health records, EHR-integrated LAI-AP registries, and smartphone apps could facilitate cross-setting communication, patient engagement, and error reduction. Addressing systemic barriers will require policy-level reform.
长效注射用抗精神病药物(LAI - APs)对于管理精神疾病至关重要,尤其是对于依从性存在挑战的患者。然而,药物核对、处方开具、制剂配制及给药过程中的错误,通常源于文件记录缺失和沟通不畅,可能会增加复发或再次入院的风险。尽管其广泛使用,但标准化的文件记录做法仍不完善。
识别医疗保健机构中与LAI - APs使用相关的文件记录不足,并提出最佳实践建议以提高安全性和护理连续性。
使用PubMed、谷歌学术、现行临床指南和灰色文献对文献进行全面综述,以识别与LAI - APs相关的安全问题和文件记录差距。检索词包括“LAI抗精神病药物用药错误”“文件记录”“安全性”“心理健康”和“药物核对”。通过浏览初始来源中引用的参考文献进一步确定相关文章。基于此分析,针对LAI - APs使用的关键方面制定了一系列最佳实践建议,重点关注实际实施策略。
关于与LAI - APs相关错误的文献有限,且关于解决这些问题的文件记录策略的细节极少。通过审查报告、从口服抗精神病药物同类药物推断建议以及分析行为健康环境特有的潜在风险因素,在LAI - APs使用过程中识别出关键的文件记录差距。这些差距包括药物核对方面的不足,尤其是与末次剂量和口服药物重叠相关的不足,以及处方开具做法、患者教育、制剂配制、给药和护理转接方面的不一致。文件记录不充分会导致漏服或重复给药、给药技术错误以及不同医疗环境之间协调不佳。我们的研究结果表明需要标准化医嘱集、易于获取的起始或停药理由文件记录、治疗药物监测和症状跟踪工具的整合、结构化的患者教育以及正式的护理转接程序。
在LAI - APs护理连续过程中加强文件记录对于减少用药错误和改善患者结局至关重要。所提出的框架为临床医生和医疗系统提供了切实可行的步骤,以实现文件记录标准化、改善护理转接期间的沟通并促进LAI - APs更安全地使用。诸如国家电子健康记录、电子健康记录集成的LAI - APs登记册和智能手机应用程序等创新举措可促进跨环境沟通、患者参与并减少错误。解决系统性障碍将需要政策层面的改革。