Heo Sejin, Chae Minjung Kathy, Yoo Suyoung, Cha Won Chul
Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Apr 25;6(3):100143. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100143. eCollection 2025 Jun.
We developed a mobile web application to help identify nontraumatic abdominal patient-reported symptoms (PRS) in patients who visited the emergency department (ED). Patients can use this during waiting times to facilitate patient history-taking by the physician. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of PRS usage in the ED by patients.
A mixed-methods study was conducted at the ED of an academic tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea. Adult patients aged ≤65 years presenting with abdominal symptoms were enrolled. We assessed PRS completion, time, and help required. Patient surveys and semi-structured interviews with patients and physicians were used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability.
A total of 30 patient surveys were analyzed, and in-depth interviews were conducted with 6 patients and 6 doctors. All participants completed the PRS in an average of 7.6 (SD, 5.0) minutes. Sixteen patients (53.3%) needed help with content, and 15 (50.0%) required technical assistance. The PRS was rated as acceptable based on the diffusion of innovation theory, with an average of 3.9 (SD, 0.76) out of 5. Patients reported that the PRS helped them communicate symptoms clearly but raised concerns about its usability for older patients or those in pain.
In our pilot study, the PRS was feasible to use but required improvements in usability. Patients were acceptable to PRS use in the ED.
我们开发了一款移动网络应用程序,以帮助识别前往急诊科(ED)就诊的非创伤性腹部患者报告的症状(PRS)。患者可以在等待期间使用该程序,以方便医生进行病史采集。本研究旨在评估患者在急诊科使用PRS的可行性和可接受性。
在韩国首尔一家学术型三级医院的急诊科进行了一项混合方法研究。纳入年龄≤65岁、有腹部症状的成年患者。我们评估了PRS的完成情况、时间和所需帮助。通过患者调查以及对患者和医生的半结构化访谈来评估可行性和可接受性。
共分析了30份患者调查问卷,并对6名患者和6名医生进行了深入访谈。所有参与者平均用时7.6(标准差5.0)分钟完成PRS。16名患者(53.3%)在内容方面需要帮助,15名患者(50.0%)需要技术协助。根据创新扩散理论,PRS的可接受性评分为平均3.9(标准差0.76)(满分5分)。患者报告称,PRS有助于他们清晰地传达症状,但对老年患者或疼痛患者的可用性表示担忧。
在我们的试点研究中,PRS使用起来是可行的,但在可用性方面需要改进。患者对在急诊科使用PRS是可接受的。