Suppr超能文献

婴儿和成人的空间不确定性与信息处理速度:扫视反应时间敏感性的年龄差异

Spatial Uncertainty and Information Processing Speed in Infants and Adults: Age Differences in Saccadic Reaction Time Sensitivity.

作者信息

Adler Scott A, Baker Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Centre for Vision Research, York University.

出版信息

J Cogn Dev. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2025.2480071.

Abstract

Speed of information processing (SIP) as determined by response to spatial uncertainty is an important, perhaps limiting factor for cognitive development. With adults, although their manual response RTs for spatial uncertainty increase linearly with increasing choices, their saccadic RTs do not. In contrast, 7-month-old infants' saccadic RTs have been shown to increase with more target choices. What is the developmental course that enables this saccadic RT discrepancy between 7-month-oldsand adults? To address this question, the present study assessed adults' and 5- and 9-month-old infants' reactive saccades in a comparable choice reaction time task that varied spatial uncertainty. Both 5- and 9-month-olds' saccadic RTs increased linearly with more choice alternatives and uncertainty. Nine-month-olds' saccadic RTs increased at a shallower rate, however, approaching the slope of adults' saccadic RT function, which did not exhibit an increase with more uncertainty. Thus, there is a developmental trend for assessing spatial SIP with saccadic RTs. As infants age, saccadic responses become less sensitive to spatial uncertainty and approach adult-like performance. Decreasing saccade sensitivity may be due to developmental changes in the influence of response selection or in the functioning of inhibitory mechanisms.

摘要

由对空间不确定性的反应所决定的信息处理速度(SIP)是认知发展的一个重要因素,甚至可能是限制因素。对于成年人来说,尽管他们对空间不确定性的手动反应反应时间(RT)会随着选择的增加而线性增加,但他们的扫视反应时间却不会。相比之下,研究表明7个月大婴儿的扫视反应时间会随着目标选择的增加而增加。是什么发展过程导致了7个月大婴儿和成年人之间的这种扫视反应时间差异呢?为了解决这个问题,本研究在一个可变空间不确定性的可比选择反应时间任务中,评估了成年人以及5个月和9个月大婴儿的反应性扫视。5个月和9个月大婴儿的扫视反应时间都随着更多的选择替代方案和不确定性而线性增加。然而,9个月大婴儿的扫视反应时间增加的速率较平缓,接近成年人扫视反应时间函数的斜率,而成年人的扫视反应时间函数不会随着更多的不确定性而增加。因此,存在一种用扫视反应时间评估空间SIP的发展趋势。随着婴儿年龄的增长,扫视反应对空间不确定性的敏感度降低,并接近成人水平的表现。扫视敏感度的降低可能是由于反应选择影响或抑制机制功能的发育变化所致。

相似文献

6
Neurocognition in youth with versus without prediabetes.有与无糖尿病前期的青年的神经认知情况
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 23:2025.06.23.25330130. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.23.25330130.

本文引用的文献

2
Do postural constraints affect eye, head, and arm coordination?姿势限制会影响眼睛、头部和手臂的协调吗?
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Oct 1;120(4):2066-2082. doi: 10.1152/jn.00200.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
The development of reactive saccade latencies.反应性扫视潜伏期的发展。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(1):159-64. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0376-z. Epub 2006 Feb 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验