Esposito Dean, Brown Benjamin, Hancock Mark Jonathan, King Samuel Stuart Graham, Searant Isaac Gerard Tom, Jenkins Hazel
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University Sydney Australia.
JOR Spine. 2025 Sep 15;8(3):e70113. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.70113. eCollection 2025 Sep.
An array of different MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) based grading systems is used to measure disc degeneration (DD) in the lumbar spine. It is currently unclear which grading systems are most commonly used to assess lumbar DD and how these grading systems are applied and reported.
The aim of this scoping review was to describe different MRI-based grading systems for DD in the lumbar spine and report which grading systems have been assessed for measurement properties such as reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Scoping review.
A search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL for studies related to MRI-based grading systems for DD in the lumbar spine, conducted in living humans. Data were extracted from each study, including the description of the grading system, which levels of the lumbar spine were graded, who graded the degeneration, how the degeneration was scored for analysis, and whether measurement properties such as reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change were assessed.
The search identified 569 studies that graded DD. Ninety-three different grading systems were identified, including 63 subjective systems, 25 quantitative systems, and 5 that were unspecified. The Pfirrmann method was used in over 50% of all reports. A range of grading components was used to measure DD, with disc signal intensity (DSI), disc height (DH), and the assessment of the distinctiveness between the annulus and nucleus being most common. Sensitivity to change was rarely assessed.
A large number of DD grading systems were identified in this review, many of which were infrequently used. Variability in methods of assessing DD on MRI and how the MRI data is synthesized may influence reported associations between DD and low back pain (LBP).
一系列基于磁共振成像(MRI)的分级系统用于测量腰椎间盘退变(DD)。目前尚不清楚哪些分级系统最常用于评估腰椎间盘退变,以及这些分级系统是如何应用和报告的。
本综述的目的是描述基于MRI的腰椎间盘退变分级系统,并报告哪些分级系统已针对可靠性、有效性和对变化的敏感性等测量属性进行了评估。
研究设计/设置:综述。
在EMBASE、Medline和CINAHL中检索与基于MRI的腰椎间盘退变分级系统相关的人体研究。从每项研究中提取数据,包括分级系统的描述、腰椎的分级水平、对退变进行分级的人员、退变如何评分以进行分析,以及是否评估了可靠性、有效性和对变化的敏感性等测量属性。
检索到569项对腰椎间盘退变进行分级的研究。确定了93种不同的分级系统,包括63种主观系统、25种定量系统和5种未明确说明的系统。超过50%的报告使用了Pfirrmann方法。一系列分级组件用于测量腰椎间盘退变,其中椎间盘信号强度(DSI)、椎间盘高度(DH)以及对纤维环和髓核之间差异的评估最为常见。对变化的敏感性很少被评估。
本综述确定了大量的腰椎间盘退变分级系统,其中许多很少使用。MRI评估腰椎间盘退变方法的差异以及MRI数据的综合方式可能会影响报告的腰椎间盘退变与腰痛(LBP)之间的关联。