Britten-Jones Alexis Ceecee, Linstrom Tom A, Makrai Eve, Singh Sumeer, Busija Ljoudmila, MacIsaac Richard J, Roberts Leslie J, Downie Laura E
Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Sep 24;9(9):CD014623. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014623.pub2.
Diffuse distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) is a common complication in people living with diabetes mellitus. There is currently no effective treatment for DSPN. There is a biological rationale that omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may modify peripheral nerve function in DSPN. However, there is a lack of certainty about the potential benefits and harms of omega-3 PUFAs as a treatment for DSPN.
To evaluate the benefits and harms of oral omega-3 PUFA supplements as a treatment for DSPN in adults with diabetes mellitus, compared to placebo or no treatment.
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and two clinical trials registries, together with reference checking, to identify studies eligible for inclusion in the review. The latest search date was 12 June 2024.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, or impaired glucose tolerance who had evidence of DSPN, that compared omega-3 PUFA supplements with placebo treatments or no treatment. We excluded studies with an intervention period of less than 180 days.
Our critical outcome was peripheral neuropathy impairment at six months after treatment. Other main outcomes were: symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, pain, quality of life, and adverse events, including any adverse events; adverse events leading to discontinuation of the intervention; and serious adverse events. We recorded outcomes as change from baseline, or the study endpoint measure, if change from baseline data were not reported.
We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess bias in the included RCTs.
We synthesised results for each outcome using meta-analysis where possible (inverse variance, random-effects model). Where this was not possible due to the nature of the data, we synthesised the results by summarising effect estimates. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the body of the evidence for each key outcome.
This review included two completed RCTs that collectively involved 87 participants.
Based on findings from one study (43 participants with type 1 diabetes), oral omega-3 PUFA supplementation for six months may have little to no effect on the short-term risk of developing peripheral neuropathy impairment (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.94; low-certainty evidence), peripheral neuropathy symptoms (MD -0.17, 95% CI -1.36 to 1.02; low-certainty evidence), or health-related quality of life (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.10; low-certainty evidence), compared to a placebo treatment. From two studies (pooled estimates from outcomes reported for 78 participants), there may be little or no difference between omega-3 PUFA and placebo supplementation with respect to the risk of developing any adverse event (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.61; P = 0.88; very low-certainty evidence) or a serious adverse event (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.85; P = 0.27; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. The included studies did not report data on pain outcomes or adverse events leading to discontinuation of the treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are inadequate data to draw conclusions about the effects of omega-3 PUFA supplementation on peripheral nerve impairment in adults with diabetes mellitus. There may be little to no benefit of oral omega-3 PUFA treatment, compared to placebo or no treatment, for improving peripheral neuropathy symptoms or health-related quality of life. While no harms of omega-3 PUFA treatment are suggested, more data are needed to elucidate any potential risks.
This review did not have dedicated funding.
Protocol available via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD014623.
弥漫性远端对称性多发性神经病(DSPN)是糖尿病患者常见的并发症。目前尚无针对DSPN的有效治疗方法。从生物学角度来看,ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)可能会改善DSPN患者的周围神经功能。然而,对于ω-3 PUFAs作为DSPN治疗方法的潜在益处和危害尚缺乏确定性。
与安慰剂或不治疗相比,评估口服ω-3 PUFA补充剂治疗成年糖尿病患者DSPN的益处和危害。
我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase以及两个临床试验注册库,并进行参考文献核对,以识别符合纳入综述标准的研究。最新检索日期为2024年6月12日。
我们纳入了涉及1型糖尿病、2型糖尿病或糖耐量受损且有DSPN证据的成年人的随机对照试验(RCTs),这些试验将ω-3 PUFA补充剂与安慰剂治疗或不治疗进行了比较。我们排除了干预期少于180天的研究。
我们的关键结局指标是治疗6个月后的周围神经病变损伤。其他主要结局指标包括:周围神经病变症状、疼痛、生活质量以及不良事件,包括任何不良事件;导致干预中断的不良事件;以及严重不良事件。如果未报告与基线数据的变化,我们将结局记录为相对于基线的变化或研究终点测量值。
我们使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估纳入的RCTs中的偏倚。
我们尽可能使用荟萃分析(逆方差、随机效应模型)对每个结局的结果进行综合。由于数据性质无法进行荟萃分析时,我们通过总结效应估计值来综合结果。我们使用GRADE评估每个关键结局证据体的确定性。
本综述纳入了两项已完成的RCTs,共涉及87名参与者。
基于一项研究(43名1型糖尿病参与者)的结果,与安慰剂治疗相比,口服ω-3 PUFA补充剂6个月对发生周围神经病变损伤的短期风险(RR 0.24,95%CI 0.03至1.94;低确定性证据)、周围神经病变症状(MD -0.17,95%CI -1.36至1.02;低确定性证据)或健康相关生活质量(MD 0.02,95%CI -0.06至0.10;低确定性证据)可能几乎没有影响。从两项研究(针对78名参与者报告的结局的汇总估计)来看,ω-3 PUFA补充剂与安慰剂补充剂在发生任何不良事件(RR 1.03,95%CI 0.66至1.61;P = 0.88;极低确定性证据)或严重不良事件(RR 0.45,95%CI 0.11至1.85;P = 0.27;极低确定性证据)的风险方面可能几乎没有差异,但证据非常不确定。纳入的研究未报告疼痛结局或导致治疗中断的不良事件的数据。
关于ω-3 PUFA补充剂对成年糖尿病患者周围神经损伤影响的数据不足,无法得出结论。与安慰剂或不治疗相比,口服ω-3 PUFA治疗在改善周围神经病变症状或健康相关生活质量方面可能几乎没有益处。虽然未提示ω-3 PUFA治疗有危害,但需要更多数据来阐明任何潜在风险。
本综述没有专项资金。
方案可通过DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD014623获取。