Erhardt Amanda Dos Santos, Bueno Mariana, Martins Taís Beppler, Menegol Natália Alves, Meireles André Luís Ferreira, Montemezzo Dayane, van Dijk Monique, Sanada Luciana Sayuri
Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Perinatol. 2025 Sep 24. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02430-x.
To evaluate the convergent construct validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency of the COMFORTneo-Brazil scale.
The study included neonates between 24 and 42 weeks of gestational age. Convergent construct validity was analyzed by comparing COMFORTneo-Brazil scores with those from the Échelle Douleur Inconfort Nouveau-Né (EDIN) scale. Two trained raters performed bedside evaluations and video assessments, separated by 10-14 days, to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability. Spearman's correlation, linear weighted kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and Cronbach's alpha were used in the analysis.
One hundred and thirty-three evaluations were conducted. There was excellent convergent validity between COMFORTneo-Brazil and EDIN scores (rho = 0.929; p < 0.001). The COMFORTneo-Brazil demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.9). Internal consistency was also high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.858).
The COMFORTneo-Brazil is a valid and reliable tool for prolonged pain assessment in neonates.
评估COMFORTneo - 巴西量表的聚合效度、评分者内信度和评分者间信度以及内部一致性。
该研究纳入了胎龄在24至42周之间的新生儿。通过将COMFORTneo - 巴西量表得分与新新生儿疼痛不适量表(EDIN)得分进行比较来分析聚合效度。两名经过培训的评分者进行床边评估和视频评估,评估间隔为10 - 14天,以评估评分者内信度和评分者间信度。分析中使用了斯皮尔曼相关性、线性加权kappa系数、组内相关系数(ICC)、布兰德 - 奥特曼图和克朗巴赫α系数。
共进行了133次评估。COMFORTneo - 巴西量表与EDIN量表得分之间具有出色的聚合效度(rho = 0.929;p < 0.001)。COMFORTneo - 巴西量表显示出出色的评分者内信度和评分者间信度(ICC > 0.9)。内部一致性也很高(克朗巴赫α系数 = 0.858)。
COMFORTneo - 巴西量表是评估新生儿长期疼痛的有效且可靠的工具。