• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与传统子结构相比,颌面硅树脂与各种三维打印树脂的粘结强度。

Bond strength of maxillofacial silicone to various three-dimensional printing resins compared to conventional substructures.

作者信息

Özcan Berna, Özcivelek Tuğgen

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Türkiye Gen Dr Tevfik Saglam St. No: 1 Kecioren, Ankara, Türkiye, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 24;25(1):1425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06854-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-06854-x
PMID:40993624
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bonding between silicone elastomers and rigid substructures is critical to clinical success of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses. This study aimed to investigate the bond strength of silicone elastomers to conventional and alternative 3-dimensional printing resin materials and the effect of artificial aging.

METHODS

The bond strength of seven resin substructure materials to a maxillofacial silicone was tested using the 180° peel test without artificial aging and after artificial aging in 14 groups. Test specimens composed of a silicone elastomer bonded to a substructure which were prepared according to ASTM D903-98 standard. A total of 70 specimens were prepared with a maxillofacial silicone bonded with a primer to substructures made of chemically polymerized clear acrylic, heat-polymerized clear acrylic and heat-polymerized pink acrylic, 3-dimensional surgical guide, 3-dimensional denture base, 3-dimensional polyetherketoneketone, and 3-dimensional polyetheretherketone resins (n = 10). Half of the specimens (n = 5 per group) were aged in an environmental chamber (Ci4400 Weather-Ometer, Atlas, Inc., USA) to assess the impact of 360 h of accelerated artificial aging. Peel bond strength values were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05). Bond failures were classified using confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

Substructure material, artificial aging, and their interaction significantly affected peel bond strength (p < 0.001). Polyetherketoneketone and polyetheretherketone exhibited significantly lower mean bond strength in non-aged groups (p < 0.05). Within the aged groups, surgical guide and denture base resins demonstrated significantly higher bond strength (p < 0.05). The most common failure type was mixed (71.4%), followed by adhesive (20%), cohesive (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional printed surgical guide resin and denture base resin specimens showed higher mean bond strength after artificial aging compared to commonly used conventional resin substructures and three- dimensional printed polyetherketoneketone and polyetheretherketone.

摘要

背景

硅橡胶弹性体与刚性支撑结构之间的粘结对于口腔外颌面修复体的临床成功至关重要。本研究旨在调查硅橡胶弹性体与传统及替代的三维打印树脂材料之间的粘结强度以及人工老化的影响。

方法

在14个组中,使用180°剥离试验测试了七种树脂支撑结构材料与颌面硅橡胶之间在未进行人工老化以及人工老化后的粘结强度。测试样本由粘结到支撑结构上的硅橡胶弹性体组成,根据ASTM D903-98标准制备。总共制备了70个样本,将颌面硅橡胶与底漆粘结到由化学聚合透明丙烯酸树脂、热聚合透明丙烯酸树脂和热聚合粉色丙烯酸树脂、三维手术导板、三维义齿基托、三维聚醚酮酮和三维聚醚醚酮树脂制成的支撑结构上(n = 10)。一半的样本(每组n = 5)在环境试验箱(Ci4400老化试验箱,美国阿特拉斯公司)中进行老化,以评估360小时加速人工老化的影响。使用双向方差分析和经Bonferroni校正的事后比较(α = 0.05)分析剥离粘结强度值。使用共聚焦显微镜对粘结失败进行分类。

结果

支撑结构材料、人工老化及其相互作用对剥离粘结强度有显著影响(p < 0.001)。在未老化组中,聚醚酮酮和聚醚醚酮的平均粘结强度显著较低(p < 0.05)。在老化组中,手术导板和义齿基托树脂的粘结强度显著较高(p < 0.05)。最常见的失败类型是混合型(71.4%),其次是粘附型(20%)、内聚型(9%)。

结论

与常用的传统树脂支撑结构以及三维打印的聚醚酮酮和聚醚醚酮相比,三维打印的手术导板树脂和义齿基托树脂样本在人工老化后显示出更高的平均粘结强度。

相似文献

1
Bond strength of maxillofacial silicone to various three-dimensional printing resins compared to conventional substructures.与传统子结构相比,颌面硅树脂与各种三维打印树脂的粘结强度。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 24;25(1):1425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06854-x.
2
Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate.颌面硅橡胶弹性体与丙烯酸酯基底的黏合。
Dent Mater. 2010 Apr;26(4):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
Adhesive retention of experimental fiber-reinforced composite, orthodontic acrylic resin, and aliphatic urethane acrylate to silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses.用于颌面修复体的实验性纤维增强复合材料、正畸丙烯酸树脂和脂肪族聚氨酯丙烯酸酯与硅橡胶的粘结固位。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jul;114(1):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
4
Effect of surface treatment on the bond strength of chairside hard liners bonded to traditional and contemporary CAD-CAM denture base polymers.表面处理对椅旁硬质衬层与传统及当代CAD-CAM义齿基托聚合物粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Aug;134(2):472.e1-472.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.010. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
5
Retention of titanium copings to implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.钛金属烤瓷冠桥修复体固位。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr;33(4):340-347. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13706. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Comparative Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Denture Base Resins Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing, Three-Dimensional Printing, and Conventional Heat Polymerization Techniques: An In Vitro Study.使用计算机辅助设计与制造、三维打印及传统热聚合技术制作的义齿基托树脂力学性能的比较评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2025 Jun 5;17(6):e85434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85434. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Effects of honeycomb surfaces on bond strength to zirconia fabricated with 3-dimensional printing.蜂窝状表面对三维打印氧化锆结合强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):226.e1-226.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.023. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
8
Evaluation of 3D printed nano-modified resin shear bond strength on titanium surfaces (an in-vitro study).3D打印纳米改性树脂与钛表面剪切粘结强度的评估(一项体外研究)
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 27;25(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06223-8.
9
Influence of different primers and adhesive system combinations on the durability of resin bonding to lithium disilicate.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Sep;134(3):749-757. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.019. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
10
Which metal surface treatment improves the bond strength between metal alloys and acrylic resin in removable partial dentures? A systematic review.哪种金属表面处理可提高可摘局部义齿中金属合金与丙烯酸树脂之间的粘结强度?一项系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Porous hollow fibers with controllable structures templated from high internal phase emulsions.具有可控结构的多孔中空纤维,其模板来自高内相乳液。
J Appl Polym Sci. 2021 Aug 10;138(30). doi: 10.1002/app.50739. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
2
Using Peek as a Framework Material for Maxillofacial Silicone Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study.使用聚醚醚酮作为颌面硅橡胶假体的框架材料:一项体外研究。
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;15(12):2694. doi: 10.3390/polym15122694.
3
Description of Poly(aryl-ether-ketone) Materials (PAEKs), Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) for Application as a Dental Material: A Materials Science Review.
聚芳醚酮材料(PAEKs)、聚醚醚酮(PEEK)和聚醚酮酮(PEKK)作为牙科材料的应用描述:材料科学综述
Polymers (Basel). 2023 May 2;15(9):2170. doi: 10.3390/polym15092170.
4
PEEK in Fixed Dental Prostheses: Application and Adhesion Improvement.聚醚醚酮在固定义齿中的应用及粘结性能改善
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jun 8;14(12):2323. doi: 10.3390/polym14122323.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Tensile Bond Strength of Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Zirconia Copings Using Resin Cement with or without Adhesive: An In Vitro Study.使用含或不含粘结剂的树脂水门汀对聚醚醚酮(PEEK)和氧化锆全冠进行拉伸粘结强度的比较评估:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 12;15(12):4167. doi: 10.3390/ma15124167.
6
Mechanical Response of PEKK and PEEK As Frameworks for Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis.聚醚酮酮(PEKK)和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)作为种植体支持全牙弓固定义齿框架的力学响应:三维有限元分析
Eur J Dent. 2022 Feb;16(1):115-121. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731833. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications.3D 打印技术在牙科领域的应用综述:技术、影响因素及应用。
Scanning. 2021 Jul 17;2021:9950131. doi: 10.1155/2021/9950131. eCollection 2021.
8
Materials in digital dentistry-A review.数字化牙科材料综述。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Mar;32(2):171-181. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12566. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Effect of plasma treatment on the peel bond strength between maxillofacial silicones and resins.等离子体处理对颌面硅橡胶与树脂间剥离粘结强度的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):242-250. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-259. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
10
Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis.颌面修复体的分类、历史及未来展望
Int J Dent. 2019 Jul 18;2019:8657619. doi: 10.1155/2019/8657619. eCollection 2019.