• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国哈尔滨社区卫生工作者对疫苗沟通培训项目的偏好:一项离散选择实验

Preferences of community health workers for vaccine communication training programs in harbin, china: a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Zhang Yuwei, Li Yuanheng, Sha Zhuowa, Wang Yazhou, Xie Yuzhuo, Zhao Zihua, Shan Linghan, Jiao Mingli

机构信息

Harbin Medical University, Nangang District, 157 Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150086, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Sep 24;25(1):1256. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07709-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07709-3
PMID:40993755
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Good communication skills among community health workers (CHWs) can improve public vaccination decision-making and alleviate vaccine hesitancy. However, in China, standardized training to improve the vaccine communication skills of CHWs is insufficient and underemphasized. Accordingly, this study examined the training preferences for CHWs' vaccine communication skills to meet the current needs of community-based vaccination services in China.

METHODS

This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) design conducted at five community health service centers in Harbin, China, between April and June 2021. Data collection included in-depth interviews and face-to-face administration of questionnaires. CHWs were recruited via convenience sampling, with eligibility criteria requiring participants to: hold vaccination qualification certificates; be full-time frontline staff with ≥ 1 year of vaccination experience; have no prior formal training in vaccine communication. A total of 164 valid questionnaires were included for analysis. Preferences for training programs were evaluated using a mixed logit model. The DCE attributes comprised training period (1 day, 3 days, 7 days), main content (vaccine basics, addressing common misconceptions, communication skills), delivery methods (online lectures, on-site seminars, case simulations), training scale (< 50, 50-100, > 100 participants), and feedback mechanisms (none, final feedback, stage-based feedback).

RESULTS

Three attributes-training period, main content of the training, and training scale-significantly influenced CHWs' training choices. CHWs preferred programs with shorter training cycles and fewer than 50 participants to improve their ability to share basic vaccine-related knowledge and had less desire to receive communication skills training. At the same time, we found no association of training modality on CHW preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a DCE, this study investigated the preferences of CHWs for participating in a vaccine communication training program. CHWs preferred a one-day training cycle, training content focusing on vaccine basics, and a small number of people to be trained. The results of this study can inform policymakers and administrators when in China developing vaccine communication training programs for CHWs.

摘要

背景

社区卫生工作者(CHWs)良好的沟通技巧可以改善公众疫苗接种决策并缓解疫苗犹豫情绪。然而,在中国,提高社区卫生工作者疫苗沟通技巧的标准化培训不足且未得到充分重视。因此,本研究调查了社区卫生工作者疫苗沟通技巧的培训偏好,以满足中国社区疫苗接种服务的当前需求。

方法

本研究采用离散选择实验(DCE)设计,于2021年4月至6月在中国哈尔滨的五个社区卫生服务中心进行。数据收集包括深入访谈和面对面问卷调查。通过便利抽样招募社区卫生工作者,入选标准要求参与者:持有疫苗接种资格证书;是具有≥1年疫苗接种经验的全职一线工作人员;没有接受过疫苗沟通方面的正规培训。共纳入164份有效问卷进行分析。使用混合逻辑模型评估对培训项目的偏好。DCE属性包括培训时长(1天、3天、7天)、主要内容(疫苗基础知识、解决常见误解、沟通技巧)、授课方式(在线讲座、现场研讨会、案例模拟)、培训规模(<50人、50 - 100人、>100人)和反馈机制(无、最终反馈、分阶段反馈)。

结果

三个属性——培训时长、培训主要内容和培训规模——显著影响社区卫生工作者的培训选择。社区卫生工作者更喜欢培训周期较短且参与人数少于50人的项目,以提高他们分享基本疫苗相关知识的能力,对接种沟通技巧培训的需求较低。同时,我们发现培训方式与社区卫生工作者的偏好没有关联。

结论

本研究使用离散选择实验调查了社区卫生工作者参与疫苗沟通培训项目的偏好。社区卫生工作者更喜欢为期一天的培训周期、侧重于疫苗基础知识的培训内容以及少量人员参与培训。本研究结果可为中国为社区卫生工作者制定疫苗沟通培训项目的政策制定者和管理人员提供参考。

相似文献

1
Preferences of community health workers for vaccine communication training programs in harbin, china: a discrete choice experiment.中国哈尔滨社区卫生工作者对疫苗沟通培训项目的偏好:一项离散选择实验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Sep 24;25(1):1256. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07709-3.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
7
A cross-sectional survey of community health workers and their roles in Indiana.印第安纳州社区卫生工作者及其角色的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13182-x.
8
Geriatric-focused education for community health workers: a dementia training that effectively provides knowledge and skills to address dementia within the scope of practice of this public health workforce.针对社区卫生工作者的老年医学教育:一项痴呆症培训,能有效地在这支公共卫生工作队伍的执业范围内提供应对痴呆症的知识和技能。
Front Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;13:1601388. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601388. eCollection 2025.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of working hours and cumulative fatigue among Chinese primary health care professionals.中国基层医疗保健专业人员工作时间与累积疲劳的关系。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 25;11:1193942. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1193942. eCollection 2023.
2
Preferences for training needs of village doctors in China: a systematic review.中国乡村医生培训需求偏好:一项系统综述
Fam Pract. 2024 Dec 2;41(6):874-882. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad063.
3
Rural job preferences of graduate class medical students in Ethiopia-a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
埃塞俄比亚医学研究生的农村工作偏好——离散选择实验(DCE)。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04133-3.
4
HPV Vaccine Communication Competency Scale for Medical Trainees: Interdisciplinary Development Study.医学生人乳头瘤病毒疫苗沟通能力量表:跨学科发展研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 4;6(11):e38164. doi: 10.2196/38164.
5
Development of Training Curriculum to Improve Patient Communication Skills and Social Support Among Community Health Workers.制定培训课程以提高社区卫生工作者的医患沟通技巧和社会支持。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Apr;6(2):e142-e150. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220518-02. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
China's population peak.中国的人口峰值。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):509. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00227-6.
7
Use of a language intervention to reduce vaccine hesitancy.使用语言干预措施减少疫苗犹豫。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04249-w.
8
[Online and offline mixed teaching mode of medical genetics].[医学遗传学线上线下混合教学模式]
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2021 Aug 25;37(8):2967-2975. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.200609.
9
Patient preferences for specialist outpatient video consultations: A discrete choice experiment.患者对专科门诊视频会诊的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Oct;29(9):707-715. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211022898. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
10
[Use of the SBAR tool: Assessment of the value of a short training course on the quality of communication between caregivers in the short and long term].[SBAR工具的使用:对短期培训课程在短期和长期内对护理人员之间沟通质量的价值评估]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Nov;49(11):823-829. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 29.