• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes and Predictors of Flow Improvement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.低流量低跨瓣压差主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血流改善的结果与预测因素
Struct Heart. 2025 May 12;9(10):100645. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100645. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Impact of flow on outcomes in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction undergoing TAVR.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.09.005.
3
Clinical outcomes following TAVR for patients with low and very low gradient aortic stenosis.低梯度和极低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的临床结局
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2025.09.005.
4
Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Conservative Management in Patients with Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与保守治疗的比较结果
Am J Cardiol. 2025 May 28;252:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.05.018.
5
Outcomes of Patients With a Small and Large Aortic Annulus Following Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Across Flow-Gradient Patterns.经导管球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗不同跨瓣压差模式下主动脉瓣环大小各异患者的结局
Struct Heart. 2025 Mar 21;9(8):100456. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100456. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
True-severe stenosis in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.矛盾性低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄中的真性重度狭窄:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结局
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Jul 21;7(4):366-377. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab010.
7
Temporal Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the TOPAS-TAVI Registry.
Can J Cardiol. 2025 Aug;41(8):1503-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.04.015. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
8
Early Stroke Volume Variation After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis.经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术后早期每搏量变异可预测低流量主动脉瓣狭窄患者的临床结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):1012-1022. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31654. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
9
5-Year Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.低风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的5年超声心动图结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun;18(6):625-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
10
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a network meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 24;2(2):CD013745. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013745.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes in High-Gradient, Classical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient, and Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Report From the SwissTAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高梯度、经典低流量-低梯度、低梯度和矛盾低流量-低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的临床结局:来自瑞士经导管主动脉瓣置换术注册研究的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;12(12):e029489. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029489. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
2
Association Between Early Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and 5-Year Clinical Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后左心室射血分数早期改善与 5 年临床结局的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Sep 1;7(9):934-944. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2222.
3
Prevalence and Outcomes of Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis-From the National Echo Database of Australia.澳大利亚国家超声心动图数据库中低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄的患病率及结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e021126. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021126. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
4
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3 期:主动脉瓣临床研究更新的终点定义。
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
5
Outcome of Flow-Gradient Patterns of Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry.主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉瓣狭窄血流梯度模式的结果:PARTNER 2 试验和注册分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008792. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008792. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
6
Poor Long-Term Survival in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis.中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期生存状况不佳。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;74(15):1851-1863. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
1-Year Survival After TAVR of Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient and High-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis in Matched Study Populations.低流量-低梯度和高梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的 1 年生存率:匹配研究人群分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):752-763. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.233.
8
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The TOPAS-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:TOPAS-TAVI 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 27;71(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.054.
9
Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄的超声心动图评估建议:欧洲心血管影像学会和美国超声心动图学会的重点更新
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):254-275. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew335.
10
Evaluation of Flow After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis of the PARTNER Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量主动脉瓣狭窄患者的血流评估:PARTNER 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;1(5):584-92. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0759.

低流量低跨瓣压差主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血流改善的结果与预测因素

Outcomes and Predictors of Flow Improvement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Besir Besir, Ali Majeed-Saidan Maryam Muhammad, Ramu Shivabalan Kathavarayan, Lomaia Tamari, Rajendran Judah, Iskandar Odette, Motairek Issam, Harb Serge C, Miyasaka Rhonda, Yun James, Puri Rishi, Reed Grant W, Krishnaswamy Amar, Kapadia Samir R

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Struct Heart. 2025 May 12;9(10):100645. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100645. eCollection 2025 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2025.100645
PMID:40994663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12455137/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flow is known to typically improve after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, the characteristics correlating with improvement are still unclear. This study sought to explore the outcomes of patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG AS) and flow improvement following TAVR compared to those without flow improvement, in addition to the predictors of flow improvement.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort of patients >18 years of age who underwent TAVR at Cleveland Clinic between 2016 and 2020. Only patients with aortic valve area <1 cm, aortic valve mean gradient <40 mmHg, and stroke volume index (SVI) ​<35 mL/m were included. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to whether SVI improved by 20% or more at the 30-day follow-up. Patients who underwent valve-in-valve TAVR were excluded. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictors of flow improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 633 patients had LFLG AS. Two hundred twenty-eight patients (36%) had SVI improvement by 20% or more. Male sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement by 10% or more 30 days post-TAVR, lower baseline SVI and paradoxical LFLG AS predicted flow improvement. There was no difference in mortality and heart failure rehospitalization between patients with and without flow improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of patients with LFLG AS show an improvement in flow post-TAVR. Paradoxical LFLG AS, male sex, lower baseline SVI, and improvement in LVEF correlated with flow improvement, whereas baseline LVEF did not. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between patients with and without flow improvement post-TAVR.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后血流通常会改善;然而,与改善相关的特征仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄(LFLG AS)患者TAVR后血流改善与未改善患者的结局,以及血流改善的预测因素。

方法

这是一项对2016年至2020年在克利夫兰诊所接受TAVR的18岁以上患者的回顾性队列研究。仅纳入主动脉瓣面积<1 cm、主动脉瓣平均压差<40 mmHg且每平方米体表面积的每搏输出量(SVI)<35 mL的患者。根据30天随访时SVI是否改善20%或更多将患者分为两组。接受瓣中瓣TAVR的患者被排除。采用二元逻辑回归评估血流改善的预测因素。

结果

共有633例患者患有LFLG AS。228例患者(36%)的SVI改善20%或更多。男性、TAVR术后30天左心室射血分数(LVEF)改善10%或更多、较低的基线SVI以及矛盾性LFLG AS可预测血流改善。血流改善与未改善的患者在死亡率和心力衰竭再住院方面无差异。

结论

三分之一的LFLG AS患者TAVR后血流有所改善。矛盾性LFLG AS、男性、较低的基线SVI以及LVEF改善与血流改善相关,而基线LVEF则不然。TAVR后血流改善与未改善的患者临床结局无差异。