Suppr超能文献

标准心血管风险预测评分低估了免疫介导性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜幸存者的风险。

Standard cardiovascular risk prediction scores underestimate risk in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura survivors.

作者信息

Javed Binish, Brown Jenna, Meade Jay, Nambi Vijay, Li Ang, Chaturvedi Shruti, Sukumar Senthil

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Aug 13;9(6):103005. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.103005. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare hematologic disorder with improved survival due to advancements in treatment. However, long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remain significant. Established cardiovascular risk calculators, such as the 2008 Framingham Heart Study (FHS) global cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk estimators, may not adequately account for the elevated and unique cardiovascular risks in iTTP survivors.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the ACC/AHA ASCVD and FHS global CVD models in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among iTTP survivors.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 135 iTTP survivors from Johns Hopkins University (1994-2024). Presence of MACEs, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac revascularization, was the primary outcome and was assessed during clinical remission. Discriminatory ability of the model was assessed using c-statistics, while calibration was evaluated with Hosmer-Lemeshow tests and calibration plots. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated.

RESULTS

MACEs occurred in 37.8% of the cohort over a median follow-up of 3.8 years. The ASCVD and FHS models demonstrated poor discrimination (c-statistics, 0.54 and 0.52, respectively) and poor calibration, with observed MACE rates exceeding predicted probabilities (Hosmer-Lemeshow < .05). The ASCVD model showed sensitivity of 56.5%, specificity of 49.4%, PPV of 36.6%, and NPV of 64.9%, while the FHS model showed sensitivity of 69.6%, specificity of 39.3%, PPV of 37.2%, and NPV of 67.9%.

CONCLUSION

Standard cardiovascular risk models inadequately predict MACE risk in iTTP survivors, underscoring the need for tailored tools that incorporate iTTP-specific factors to improve cardiovascular risk stratification and management.

摘要

背景

免疫介导的血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(iTTP)是一种罕见的血液系统疾病,由于治疗进展,生存率有所提高。然而,长期心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率仍然很高。已有的心血管风险计算器,如2008年弗雷明汉心脏研究(FHS)全球心血管疾病(CVD)和美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险评估器,可能无法充分考虑iTTP幸存者中升高的独特心血管风险。

目的

评估ACC/AHA ASCVD和FHS全球CVD模型在预测iTTP幸存者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)方面的辨别力和校准情况。

方法

这项回顾性研究分析了约翰霍普金斯大学(1994 - 2024年)的135名iTTP幸存者。MACE的发生情况,包括心肌梗死、中风和心脏血运重建,是主要结局,并在临床缓解期进行评估。使用c统计量评估模型的辨别能力,同时用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和校准图评估校准情况。还计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

在中位随访3.8年期间,37.8%的队列发生了MACE。ASCVD和FHS模型显示辨别力较差(c统计量分别为0.54和0.52)且校准不佳,观察到的MACE发生率超过预测概率(Hosmer-Lemeshow <.05)。ASCVD模型的敏感性为56.5%,特异性为49.4%,PPV为36.6%,NPV为64.9%,而FHS模型的敏感性为69.6%,特异性为39.3%,PPV为37.2%,NPV为67.9%。

结论

标准心血管风险模型不能充分预测iTTP幸存者的MACE风险,这突出表明需要纳入iTTP特异性因素的定制工具,以改善心血管风险分层和管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0707/12454890/25422bf9e83d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验