• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建基于电子健康记录的、具有临床可操作性的机器学习模型以预测1型糖尿病青少年血红蛋白A的90天变化:可行性与模型开发研究

Toward a Clinically Actionable, Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Forecast 90-Day Change in Hemoglobin A in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: Feasibility and Model Development Study.

作者信息

Tallon Erin M, Williams David D, Schweisberger Cintya, Mullaney Colin, Lockee Brent, Ferro Diana, Vandervelden Craig A, Barnes Mitchell S, Sarteau Angelica Cristello, Kahkoska Anna R, Patton Susana R, Mehta Sanjeev, McDonough Ryan, Lind Marcus, D'Avolio Leonard, Clements Mark A

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Children's Mercy Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, United States, 1 8166014023.

Department of Pediatrics, UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Sep 25;10:e69142. doi: 10.2196/69142.

DOI:10.2196/69142
PMID:40997334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12463387/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians currently lack an effective means for identifying youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who are at risk for experiencing glycemic deterioration between diabetes clinic visits. As a result, their ability to identify youth who may optimally benefit from targeted interventions designed to address rising glycemic levels is limited. Although electronic health records (EHR)-based risk predictions have been used to forecast health outcomes in T1D, no study has investigated the potential for using EHR data to identify youth with T1D who will experience a clinically significant rise in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥0.3% (approximately 3 mmol/mol) between diabetes clinic visits.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using routinely collected EHR data to develop a machine learning model to predict 90-day unit-change in HbA1c (in % units) in youth (aged 9-18 y) with T1D. We assessed our model's ability to augment clinical decision-making by identifying a percent change cut point that optimized identification of youth who would experience a clinically significant rise in HbA1c.

METHODS

From a cohort of 2757 youth with T1D who received care from a network of pediatric diabetes clinics in the Midwestern United States (January 2012-August 2017), we identified 1743 youth with 9643 HbA1c observation windows (ie, 2 HbA1c measurements separated by 70-110 d, approximating the 90-day time interval between routine diabetes clinic visits). We used up to 5 years of youths' longitudinal EHR data to transform 17,466 features (demographics, laboratory results, vital signs, anthropometric measures, medications, diagnosis codes, procedure codes, and free-text data) for model training. We performed 3-fold cross-validation to train random forest regression models to predict 90-day unit-change in HbA1c(%).

RESULTS

Across all 3 folds of our cross-validation model, the average root-mean-square error was 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.90). Predicted HbA1c(%) strongly correlated with true HbA1c(%) (r=0.79; 95% CI 0.78-0.80). The top 10 features impacting model predictions included postal code, various metrics related to HbA1c, and the frequency of a diagnosis code indicating difficulty with treatment engagement. At a clinically significant percent rise threshold of ≥0.3% (approximately 3 mmol/mol), our model's positive predictive value was 60.3%, indicating a 1.5-fold enrichment (relative to the observed frequency that youth experienced this outcome [3928/9643, 40.7%]). Model sensitivity and positive predictive value improved when thresholds for clinical significance included smaller changes in HbA1c, whereas specificity and negative predictive value improved when thresholds required larger changes in HbA1c.

CONCLUSIONS

Routinely collected EHR data can be used to create an ML model for predicting unit-change in HbA1c between diabetes clinic visits among youth with T1D. Future work will focus on optimizing model performance and validating the model in additional cohorts and in other diabetes clinics.

摘要

背景

临床医生目前缺乏一种有效的方法来识别1型糖尿病(T1D)青少年患者,这些患者在糖尿病门诊就诊期间存在血糖恶化风险。因此,他们识别那些可能从旨在解决血糖水平升高的针对性干预措施中获得最大益处的青少年的能力有限。虽然基于电子健康记录(EHR)的风险预测已被用于预测T1D的健康结果,但尚无研究调查利用EHR数据识别在糖尿病门诊就诊期间糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)将出现临床显著升高≥0.3%(约3 mmol/mol)的T1D青少年的可能性。

目的

我们旨在评估利用常规收集的EHR数据开发机器学习模型以预测9-18岁T1D青少年患者HbA1c(以%为单位)90天单位变化的可行性。我们通过确定一个百分比变化切点来优化对HbA1c将出现临床显著升高的青少年的识别,从而评估我们模型增强临床决策的能力。

方法

在美国中西部地区一个儿科糖尿病诊所网络接受治疗的2757例T1D青少年队列中(2012年1月至2017年8月),我们识别出1743例青少年,他们有9643个HbA1c观察窗(即两次HbA1c测量间隔70 - 110天,近似常规糖尿病门诊就诊的90天时间间隔)。我们使用青少年长达5年的纵向EHR数据来转换17466个特征(人口统计学、实验室结果、生命体征、人体测量指标、药物、诊断编码、手术编码和自由文本数据)用于模型训练。我们进行3折交叉验证以训练随机森林回归模型来预测HbA1c(%)的90天单位变化。

结果

在我们交叉验证模型的所有3折中,平均均方根误差为0.88(95% CI 0.85 - 0.90)。预测的HbA1c(%)与实际HbA1c(%)高度相关(r = 0.79;95% CI 0.78 - 0.80)。影响模型预测的前10个特征包括邮政编码、与HbA1c相关的各种指标以及一个表明治疗参与困难的诊断编码的频率。在临床显著百分比升高阈值≥0.3%(约3 mmol/mol)时,我们模型的阳性预测值为60.3%,表明富集了1.5倍(相对于青少年出现此结果的观察频率[3928/9643, 40.7%])。当临床显著性阈值包括HbA1c较小变化时,模型敏感性和阳性预测值提高,而当阈值要求HbA1c有较大变化时,特异性和阴性预测值提高。

结论

常规收集的EHR数据可用于创建一个机器学习模型,以预测T1D青少年患者在糖尿病门诊就诊期间HbA1c的单位变化。未来的工作将集中在优化模型性能,并在其他队列和其他糖尿病诊所验证该模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018f/12463387/a0ecf0fbc823/diabetes-v10-e69142-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018f/12463387/c6b84473aa10/diabetes-v10-e69142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018f/12463387/c11a5f789df2/diabetes-v10-e69142-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018f/12463387/a0ecf0fbc823/diabetes-v10-e69142-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018f/12463387/c6b84473aa10/diabetes-v10-e69142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018f/12463387/c11a5f789df2/diabetes-v10-e69142-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/018f/12463387/a0ecf0fbc823/diabetes-v10-e69142-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Toward a Clinically Actionable, Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Forecast 90-Day Change in Hemoglobin A in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: Feasibility and Model Development Study.构建基于电子健康记录的、具有临床可操作性的机器学习模型以预测1型糖尿病青少年血红蛋白A的90天变化:可行性与模型开发研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Sep 25;10:e69142. doi: 10.2196/69142.
2
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
6
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
8
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
10
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological and Clinical Challenges in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes during Adolescence: A Narrative Review.青少年1型糖尿病管理中的心理和临床挑战:一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 4;11(9):1085. doi: 10.3390/children11091085.
2
Prediction of Poor Glycemic Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes.预测 1 型糖尿病儿童的血糖控制不佳。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:1759-1760. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240770.
3
A Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification of Postdiagnosis Diabetic Ketoacidosis Hospitalization in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Retrospective Study.
用于1型糖尿病儿童诊断后糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院风险分层的机器学习模型:回顾性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Aug 7;9:e53338. doi: 10.2196/53338.
4
Harnessing EHR data for health research.利用电子健康记录数据进行健康研究。
Nat Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):1847-1855. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03074-8. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
5
Predicting type 1 diabetes in children using electronic health records in primary care in the UK: development and validation of a machine-learning algorithm.使用英国初级保健中的电子健康记录预测儿童 1 型糖尿病:机器学习算法的开发和验证。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Jun;6(6):e386-e395. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00050-5.
6
Assessing Patterns of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use and Metrics of Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the Veterans Health Care System: Integrating Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device Data with Electronic Health Records Data.评估退伍军人医疗保健系统中 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病患者的连续血糖监测使用模式和血糖控制指标:将连续血糖监测设备数据与电子健康记录数据相结合。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Nov;26(11):806-813. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0083. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
7
Identifying the deficiencies of currently available CGM to improve uptake and benefit.确定目前可用的 CGM 的缺陷,以提高采用率和获益。
Diabet Med. 2024 Aug;41(8):e15338. doi: 10.1111/dme.15338. Epub 2024 May 12.
8
Child Opportunity Index and clinical characteristics at diabetes diagnosis in youth: type 1 diabetes versus type 2 diabetes.儿童机会指数与青少年糖尿病诊断时的临床特征:1 型糖尿病与 2 型糖尿病。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Apr 17;12(2):e003968. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003968.
9
Prevalence of Type 1 Diabetes Among US Children and Adults by Age, Sex, Race, and Ethnicity.按年龄、性别、种族和族裔划分的美国儿童和成人1型糖尿病患病率。
JAMA. 2024 Apr 23;331(16):1411-1413. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.2103.
10
The Reporting Quality of Machine Learning Studies on Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.机器学习在儿科糖尿病研究中的报告质量:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 19;26:e47430. doi: 10.2196/47430.