Suppr超能文献

优化和评估多通道经颅磁刺激的聚焦性。

Optimizing and assessing multichannel TMS focality.

作者信息

Numssen Ole, Martin Carla W, Worbs Torge, Thielscher Axel, Weise Konstantin, Knösche Thomas R

机构信息

Methods and Development Group Brain Networks, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

Institute of Computer Science, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2025 Sep 19:2025.09.19.677136. doi: 10.1101/2025.09.19.677136.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multichannel transcranial magnetic stimulation (mTMS) enables electronic steering of induced electric fields across multiple cortical targets without physical coil repositioning, addressing key limitations of conventional single-channel TMS (sTMS). However, determining optimal input currents for focal stimulation remains challenging, and different mTMS systems have not been systematically compared under realistic hardware constraints.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an user-centric framework for optimizing and assessing mTMS focality by introducing a generic optimization algorithm, establishing meaningful focality metrics, and comparing mTMS coil arrays with traditional single-channel TMS across cortical targets.

METHODS

We developed a fast optimization framework incorporating target E-field constraints via parametrization of degenerated hyperellipsoids, explicitly integrating current-rate limits, for example from stimulator electronics and coil heating. Using high-resolution finite-element models of nine individual brains, we compared two mTMS designs (5-channel planar and 6/12-channel spherical systems) with standard sTMS figure-of-eight coils. Three complementary metrics quantified performance: Focality, Target2Max, and OverstimulatedArea.

RESULTS

Despite using a single optimized placement for all region-of-interest targets, mTMS achieved focality comparable to repositioned single-channel TMS. For superficial targets, single-channel TMS showed slightly better focality, but for deeper cortical targets (>25mm skin-cortex distance), mTMS performed similarly. More stimulation channels improved focality but required stronger current-rate constraints. The planar design performed better for deeper targets, while spherical designs improved with additional channels.

CONCLUSION

mTMS systems demonstrate remarkable performance comparable to standard TMS, enabling efficient multi-target stimulation without repositioning. Our open-source framework provides practical tools for designing and evaluating mTMS systems, supporting goal-directed mTMS development and effective application.

摘要

背景

多通道经颅磁刺激(mTMS)能够在不重新定位物理线圈的情况下,对多个皮质靶点的感应电场进行电子控制,解决了传统单通道TMS(sTMS)的关键局限性。然而,确定聚焦刺激的最佳输入电流仍然具有挑战性,并且不同的mTMS系统在实际硬件限制下尚未进行系统比较。

目的

通过引入通用优化算法、建立有意义的聚焦度指标,并在皮质靶点上比较mTMS线圈阵列与传统单通道TMS,开发一个以用户为中心的框架来优化和评估mTMS的聚焦度。

方法

我们开发了一个快速优化框架,通过退化超椭球体的参数化纳入目标电场约束,明确整合电流速率限制,例如来自刺激器电子设备和线圈加热的限制。使用九个个体大脑的高分辨率有限元模型,我们将两种mTMS设计(5通道平面和6/12通道球形系统)与标准的sTMS八字形线圈进行了比较。三个互补指标量化了性能:聚焦度、目标到最大值和过度刺激区域。

结果

尽管对所有感兴趣区域的靶点都使用了单一优化放置,但mTMS实现的聚焦度与重新定位的单通道TMS相当。对于浅表靶点,单通道TMS显示出略好的聚焦度,但对于更深的皮质靶点(皮肤-皮质距离>25mm),mTMS表现类似。更多的刺激通道改善了聚焦度,但需要更强的电流速率约束。平面设计对于更深的靶点表现更好,而球形设计随着额外通道的增加而有所改进。

结论

mTMS系统表现出与标准TMS相当的卓越性能,无需重新定位即可实现高效的多靶点刺激。我们的开源框架为设计和评估mTMS系统提供了实用工具,支持目标导向的mTMS开发和有效应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13ad/12458232/e559e3e23474/nihpp-2025.09.19.677136v1-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验