• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整体式氧化锆与三种不同核材料之间剪切粘结强度的比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Monolithic Zirconia and Three Different Core Build-Up Materials.

作者信息

Şentürk Ayben, Akat Bora, Gönüldaş Fehmi, Halaçlı Onur Alp, Kartal Selin, Kılıçarslan Mehmet Ali

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, Ankara University, 06500 Ankara, Turkey.

Prosthetic Dentistry Program, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara University, 06500 Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Funct Biomater. 2025 Sep 21;16(9):355. doi: 10.3390/jfb16090355.

DOI:10.3390/jfb16090355
PMID:41003426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12470514/
Abstract

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) between monolithic zirconia (MZ) and different core build-up materials. Sixty cylindrical MZ specimens were fabricated and divided into three groups ( = 20) based on the type of core build-up material: nanohybrid composite resin (NHCR), glass ionomer cement (GIC), and zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement (zirconomer). All specimens were subjected to airborne-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide and bonded using a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement. After 24 h of storage in distilled water at 37 °C, SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were examined under a stereomicroscope and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. The NHCR group exhibited the highest SBS values (48.32 ± 12.49 MPa), followed by the Zirkonomer group (14.19 ± 3.66 MPa), and the GIC group (10.37 ± 4.21 MPa). The SBS of NHCR was significantly higher than that of both Zirconomer and GIC ( < 0.001). Although no significant difference was found between Zirconomer and GIC, Zirconomer demonstrated higher mean bond strength. Within the limitations of this study, NHCR showed the highest bond strength to monolithic zirconia. Zirconomer performed better than conventional GIC; however, further investigations involving different surface treatments and long-term clinical conditions are recommended to enhance its bonding efficacy.

摘要

本体外研究旨在评估和比较整体式氧化锆(MZ)与不同核材料之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。制作了60个圆柱形MZ试件,并根据核材料类型分为三组(每组 = 20个):纳米混合复合树脂(NHCR)、玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)和氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀(氧化锆聚羧酸锌水门汀)。所有试件均用氧化铝进行空气颗粒喷砂处理,并使用自粘性双固化树脂水门汀进行粘结。在37℃蒸馏水中储存24小时后,使用万能试验机进行SBS测试。在体视显微镜下检查破坏模式,并分为粘结破坏、内聚破坏或混合破坏。NHCR组的SBS值最高(48.32±12.49MPa),其次是氧化锆聚羧酸锌水门汀组(14.19±3.66MPa)和GIC组(10.37±4.21MPa)。NHCR的SBS显著高于氧化锆聚羧酸锌水门汀和GIC(<0.001)。虽然氧化锆聚羧酸锌水门汀和GIC之间未发现显著差异,但氧化锆聚羧酸锌水门汀显示出更高的平均粘结强度。在本研究的局限性内,NHCR对整体式氧化锆的粘结强度最高。氧化锆聚羧酸锌水门汀的性能优于传统GIC;然而,建议进行涉及不同表面处理和长期临床条件的进一步研究,以提高其粘结效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/b38a5875873f/jfb-16-00355-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/523fa0310765/jfb-16-00355-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/92ead29a3e99/jfb-16-00355-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/def796188adf/jfb-16-00355-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/b38a5875873f/jfb-16-00355-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/523fa0310765/jfb-16-00355-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/92ead29a3e99/jfb-16-00355-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/def796188adf/jfb-16-00355-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772b/12470514/b38a5875873f/jfb-16-00355-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Between Monolithic Zirconia and Three Different Core Build-Up Materials.整体式氧化锆与三种不同核材料之间剪切粘结强度的比较评估
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Sep 21;16(9):355. doi: 10.3390/jfb16090355.
2
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength at the interface of monolithic zirconia with two distinct core build-up materials: An study.全瓷氧化锆与两种不同核修复材料界面的抗剪粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Apr-Jun;23(2):178-183. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_1_23.
3
An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments.使用不同表面处理方法对氧化锆与牙釉质的剪切粘结强度进行的体外比较。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;23(2):117-23. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12075. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
4
In vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength and bioactivity of a bioceramic cement for bonding monolithic zirconia.体外评估用于粘结整体氧化锆的生物陶瓷水泥的抗剪粘结强度和生物活性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):167.e1-167.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an Study.生物活性修复材料、氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀和传统玻璃离子水门汀与乳磨牙牙本质表面剪切粘结强度的比较评价:一项研究。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Dec;22(4):260-266. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87115.1230.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Type IX Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An Study.氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和IX型玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的吸水性、溶解性和显微硬度的比较评价:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Mar-Apr;15(2):175-181. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2364.
7
Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.不同表面处理对氧化锆桩与复合树脂核材料之间短期粘结强度和耐久性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 May;99(5):388-99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60088-8.
8
In vitro shear bond strength of Y-TZP ceramics to different core materials with the use of three primer/resin cement systems.使用三种底涂剂/树脂水门汀系统时,Y-TZP陶瓷与不同核材料的体外剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jan;115(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
9
Air abrasion before and/or after zirconia sintering: surface characterization, flexural strength, and resin cement bond strength.氧化锆烧结前后的气磨处理:表面特性、弯曲强度及树脂水门汀粘结强度
Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):E66-75. doi: 10.2341/14-013-LR1. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
10
Bonding property of two resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cements to zirconia ceramic.两种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀与氧化锆陶瓷的粘结性能。
Quintessence Int. 2010 Jul-Aug;41(7):e132-40.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride Release Profiles of a GIC and Chitosan-modified GIC.玻璃离子水门汀及壳聚糖改性玻璃离子水门汀的力学性能和氟释放曲线评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2025 May 1;26(5):468-472. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3844.
2
Retrospective Long-Term Survival Rate and Clinical Performance of Zirconium Oxide Restorations over the Past 5 Years: A Comparative Study Between Single Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses.过去5年中氧化锆修复体的回顾性长期生存率及临床性能:单冠与固定义齿的对比研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 24;61(2):210. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020210.
3
Mechanical properties and degree of conversion of resin-based core build-up materials and short fiber-reinforced flowable resin-based composite.
树脂基核修复材料和短纤维增强型可流动树脂基复合材料的机械性能和转化率。
Dent Mater J. 2024 Jun 1;43(3):453-459. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2023-207. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Toughness and Flexural Strength of Four Different Core Build-up Materials: An Study.四种不同核材料的断裂韧性和弯曲强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Feb 1;25(2):191-195. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3624.
5
Effect of protective coating agents on microleakage and flexural strength of glass ionomer cement and zirconomer. an in vitro study.保护涂料对玻璃离子水门汀和氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀微渗漏和弯曲强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00853-8. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
6
The influence of core-build up materials on biaxial flexural strength of monolithic strength-gradient zirconia; an in-vitro study.堆积核材料对整体梯度氧化锆双轴弯曲强度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03635-2.
7
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength at the interface of monolithic zirconia with two distinct core build-up materials: An study.全瓷氧化锆与两种不同核修复材料界面的抗剪粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Apr-Jun;23(2):178-183. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_1_23.
8
Reinforcement of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with glass fiber and graphene oxide.玻璃纤维和氧化石墨烯增强树脂改性玻璃离子水泥。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Jun;142:105850. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105850. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
9
Zirconia Nanoparticles as Reinforcing Agents for Contemporary Dental Luting Cements: Physicochemical Properties and Shear Bond Strength to Monolithic Zirconia.氧化锆纳米颗粒作为当代牙科水门汀的增强剂:物理化学性能及对整体氧化锆的抗剪粘接强度。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 20;24(3):2067. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032067.
10
Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramic to Four Different Core Materials, An Study.氧化锆陶瓷与四种不同核材料的剪切粘结强度研究
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Jun;22(2):138-143. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.86215.1176.