Solera-Alfonso Adrian, Mijarra-Murillo Juan-José, Marconnot Romain, Gacría-González Miriam, Delfa-de-la-Morena José-Manuel, Anglada-Monzón Pablo, Ruiz-Barquín Roberto
Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcon, Spain.
Department Physical Education, Sport and Human Motricity, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 28;12(9):1139. doi: 10.3390/children12091139.
Leadership in physical education plays a critical role in the holistic development of students, influencing variables such as satisfaction, group cohesion, and performance. Despite the abundance of cross-sectional studies, there is a paucity of longitudinal evidence exploring the temporal stability of these perceptions in adolescent populations, which limits the current understanding of leadership development in educational settings. This longitudinal study investigates how secondary and high school students perceive and prefer different leadership styles in PE and how these relate to gender, academic level, and sport participation, grounded in the multidimensional leadership model. The analysis is further contextualized by recent research emphasizing adaptive, evidence-based pedagogical approaches in physical education, the influence of competitive environments on leadership expectations, and the role of emotional support in training contexts. Using validated questionnaires (LSS-1 and LSS-2), five dimensions were assessed: Training and Instruction, democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, Social Support, and positive feedback, considering variables such as gender, academic level, and extracurricular sport participation. Data were collected at two time points over a 12-month interval, enabling the identification of temporal patterns in students' perceptions and preferences. Sampling procedures were clearly defined to enhance transparency and potential replicability, and the choice of a convenience sample from two private schools was justified by accessibility and continuity in longitudinal tracking. Although no a priori power analysis was conducted, the sample size (n = 370) was deemed adequate for the non-parametric analyses employed, with an estimated statistical power ≥ 0.80 for medium effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.3-0.5). The results revealed a marked preference for leadership styles emphasizing social support and positive feedback, particularly among students engaged in sports. Statistically significant differences ( < 0.05) were identified based on gender and academic maturity, with female students favoring democratic behavior and students in the fourth year of compulsory secondary education showing a stronger inclination toward styles prioritizing emotional support. Trends toward statistical significance ( < 0.10) were also reported, following precedents in the sport psychology and sport sciences literature, as they provide potentially relevant indications for future research directions. The congruence between perceived and preferred leadership emerged as a key factor in student satisfaction, confirming that adaptive leadership enhances students' learning experiences and overall well-being. However, this satisfaction was inferred from congruence measures, rather than directly assessed, representing a key methodological limitation. This study underscores the importance of physical education teachers tailoring their leadership styles to the individual and group characteristics of their students. The findings align with methodological approaches used in preference hierarchy analyses in sport contexts and support calls for individualized pedagogical strategies observed in sports medicine and training research. By providing longitudinal evidence on leadership perception stability and integrating recent cross-disciplinary findings, the study makes an original contribution to bridging the gap between educational theory and practice. The results address a gap in the literature concerning the temporal stability of leadership perceptions among adolescents, offering a theoretically grounded basis for future research and the design of pedagogical innovations in PE.
体育教育中的领导力在学生的全面发展中起着关键作用,影响着诸如满意度、团队凝聚力和表现等变量。尽管有大量的横断面研究,但缺乏纵向证据来探究青少年群体中这些认知的时间稳定性,这限制了目前对教育环境中领导力发展的理解。这项纵向研究基于多维领导力模型,调查了初中生和高中生如何看待和偏好体育教育中的不同领导风格,以及这些风格与性别、学业水平和体育参与之间的关系。近期强调体育教育中适应性、循证教学方法的研究、竞争环境对领导期望的影响以及情感支持在训练环境中的作用,进一步为该分析提供了背景。使用经过验证的问卷(LSS - 1和LSS - 2),评估了五个维度:训练与指导、民主行为、专制行为、社会支持和积极反馈,同时考虑了性别、学业水平和课外体育参与等变量。在12个月的间隔内分两个时间点收集数据,从而能够识别学生认知和偏好中的时间模式。明确界定了抽样程序以提高透明度和潜在的可重复性,从两所私立学校选择便利样本的理由是便于纵向跟踪且具有连续性。尽管未进行预先的功效分析,但样本量(n = 370)被认为足以进行所采用的非参数分析,对于中等效应量(科恩d = 0.3 - 0.5),估计统计功效≥ 0.80。结果显示,学生明显偏好强调社会支持和积极反馈的领导风格,尤其是在参与体育运动的学生中。基于性别和学业成熟度确定了具有统计学意义的差异(< 0.05),女生更倾向于民主行为,义务教育四年级的学生对优先考虑情感支持的领导风格表现出更强的倾向。遵循运动心理学和运动科学文献中的先例,也报告了接近统计学意义的趋势(< 0.10),因为它们为未来的研究方向提供了潜在的相关指示。感知到的领导风格与偏好的领导风格之间的一致性成为学生满意度的关键因素,证实了适应性领导能够增强学生的学习体验和整体幸福感。然而,这种满意度是从一致性测量中推断出来的,而不是直接评估的,这是一个关键的方法学局限性。本研究强调了体育教师根据学生的个体和群体特征调整其领导风格的重要性。研究结果与运动情境中偏好层次分析所采用的方法一致,并支持体育医学和训练研究中所倡导的个性化教学策略。通过提供关于领导力认知稳定性的纵向证据并整合近期的跨学科研究结果,该研究为弥合教育理论与实践之间的差距做出了原创性贡献。研究结果填补了文献中关于青少年领导力认知时间稳定性的空白,为未来的研究以及体育教育中教学创新的设计提供了理论基础。