Suppr超能文献

工作内容问卷(JCQ)2.0背后的需求、控制和稳定性支持结构——一种评估多层次工作特征的创新工具。

The Structure of Demand, Control, and Stability-Support Underlying the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) 2.0-An Innovative Tool for Assessing Multilevel Work Characteristics.

作者信息

Formazin Maren, Choi BongKyoo, Dollard Maureen F, Li Jian, McLinton Sarven S, Agbenyikey Wilfred, Cho Sung-Il, Houtman Irene, Karasek Robert

机构信息

Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Division "Work and Health", 10317 Berlin, Germany.

Center for Work and Health Research, Irvine, CA 92620, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Sep 8;22(9):1403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22091403.

Abstract

Dominant theories in the field of occupational stress have so far mainly focused only on job task level psychosocial factors. Our novelty was to move the field forward by testing a new multilevel conceptualization of workplace health-related psychosocial factors, captured in the new JCQ 2.0 tool. The JCQ 2.0 tool assesses the theoretical constructs Demand (D), Control (C) and Stability-Support (S-S) at the task and the organizational level in accordance with the Associationalist Demand/Control (ADC) Model. We aimed for a first step to assess the generalizability of the framework by collecting data in four different countries (Korea, China, Australia, and Germany). Using structural equation modeling, the task level three-factor DCS structure was largely confirmed across all four countries (with one exception: skill discretion was an indicator of both control and demand). The organizational level, three-factor DCS-S structure was tested and confirmed in the German data only (only data with sufficient scales). Similarly, the multilevel DCS-S model could only be tested with the German data only and was largely confirmed with the three organizational level factors (D, C, and S-S) as antecedents to their task level analogues (with one exception: supervisor support was an indicator of organizational rather than task level support). The findings provide a first step to advancing existing knowledge by providing preliminary support for a multilevel DCS model. Further multilevel longitudinal research is required to verify the main findings and explain some of the nuances uncovered here.

摘要

职业压力领域的主流理论迄今为止主要仅关注工作任务层面的社会心理因素。我们的创新之处在于通过测试一种新的与工作场所健康相关的社会心理因素的多层次概念化来推动该领域的发展,这一概念化体现在新的JCQ 2.0工具中。JCQ 2.0工具根据联想主义需求/控制(ADC)模型在任务和组织层面评估理论构念需求(D)、控制(C)和稳定性-支持(S-S)。我们的目标是迈出第一步,通过在四个不同国家(韩国、中国、澳大利亚和德国)收集数据来评估该框架的可推广性。使用结构方程模型,任务层面的三因素DCS结构在所有四个国家中基本得到证实(有一个例外:技能自主性是控制和需求的一个指标)。组织层面的三因素DCS-S结构仅在德国数据中进行了测试和证实(只有具备足够量表的数据)。同样,多层次DCS-S模型只能用德国数据进行测试,并且在很大程度上得到证实,其中三个组织层面因素(D、C和S-S)是其任务层面类似因素的前因(有一个例外:上级支持是组织层面而非任务层面支持的一个指标)。这些发现为推进现有知识提供了第一步,为多层次DCS模型提供了初步支持。需要进一步开展多层次纵向研究来验证主要发现并解释此处发现的一些细微差别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验