Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation Modulates Spinal Reflex Circuit Excitability in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

: Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) is a noninvasive stimulation approach to modulate spinal reflex circuit excitability after spinal cord injury (SCI) Posterior root muscle (PRM) reflexes can be used to characterize the change in excitability of spinal reflex circuits after TSS; these responses are likely influenced by stimulus parameters. : We compared PRM reflex responses to 3 TSS conditions: single-site continuous (SS-CONT), single-site burst (SS-BURST), and dual-site continuous (DS-CONT). Stimulation (frequency: 50 Hz, intensity: 80% soleus reflex threshold[RT]) was delivered for 30 min. The cathode was placed over the thoracic spine (T11-T12) and anodes placed paraumbilically; a second cathode over the lumbar spine (L1/2 or L2/3) was used for DS-CONT. PRM reflex responses in the soleus were elicited by paired 1 ms monophasic conditioning-test stimuli at a 50 ms interstimulus interval via the T11-12 cathode and paraumbilical anodes. Soleus PRM reflex indices included RT, response amplitude at 1.2xRT (RA), slope, area under the input-output curve (AUC). Paired-pulse indices were collected, including paired-pulse depression (PPD) and depression of the area under the curve (AUC). To assess the correlation between biomechanical and electrophysiologic measures of soleus spasticity, the ankle clonus drop test first drop excursion (FDE) was measured. All indices were measured at baseline and immediately post-intervention. : In whole-group analyses, PPD and AUC were significantly decreased. Significant decreases in PPD and AUC were identified only after the SS-CONT condition. No significant changes were identified in other PRM reflex indices after any of the 3 TSS conditions. No relationships between baseline FDE and any PRM reflex parameter were identified at baseline. : With stimulation intensity of 80% soleus RT, modulation of targeted spinal reflex circuits was observed only in the SS-CONT condition when the response of the conditioning and test stimuli were considered. In addition, stretch-induced spasticity of the soleus may not be consistent with electrophysiologic testing.