Vidal Celia, Mallet Jean-Pierre, Skinner Sarah, Gilson Raphael, Gaubert Olivier, Prigent Arnaud, Gagnadoux Frédéric, Borel Jean-Christian, Bourdin Arnaud, Molinari Nicolas, Jaffuel Dany
Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Montpellier University, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Groupe Adène, 34080 Montpellier, France.
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 11;14(18):6424. doi: 10.3390/jcm14186424.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effectiveness can be compromised by adverse effects. Despite its potential impact on adherence and sleepiness, aerophagia remains under-recognized and poorly characterized. This ancillary analysis of the InterfaceVent study aimed to identify risk factors for aerophagia in a large real-life cohort of CPAP-treated patients and to assess its association with both CPAP adherence and sleepiness. InterfaceVent was a prospective, real-life, cross-sectional study. Adults treated for at least 3 months with CPAP were included. Patients self-reported mask-related side effects using visual analogue scales. Aerophagia was defined as a dichotomous outcome based on patient-reported symptoms and CPAP non-adherence as mean nightly usage <4 h. Sleepiness was assessed using Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). A total of 1461 patients (median age 67 years (Q1-Q3; 60-74); 27.6% women) were included. Aerophagia was reported by 8.3% of participants. Compared to patients without aerophagia, those affected were younger, more frequently female, and had lower BMI. Patients with aerophagia reported a median ESS score of 7 (4-10) versus 5 (3-8) for patients without aerophagia ( < 0.001). CPAP usage was significantly lower in the aerophagia group (median 6.37 vs. 6.75 h/day; = 0.001), whereas non-adherence, did not significantly differ between groups (10.7% vs. 7.5%; = 0.20). This ancillary analysis of the InterfaceVent study highlights the burden of aerophagia in CPAP-treated patients and identifies modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. Better recognition and management of this under-reported side effect may improve CPAP adherence and patient comfort. InterfaceVent is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03013283). The first registration date is 23 December 2016.
持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的有效性可能会受到不良反应的影响。尽管气吞症对依从性和嗜睡有潜在影响,但它仍然未得到充分认识,其特征也了解甚少。这项对InterfaceVent研究的辅助分析旨在确定在接受CPAP治疗的大量真实队列患者中气吞症的危险因素,并评估其与CPAP依从性和嗜睡的关系。InterfaceVent是一项前瞻性、真实、横断面研究。纳入了接受CPAP治疗至少3个月的成年人。患者使用视觉模拟量表自我报告与面罩相关的副作用。气吞症根据患者报告的症状定义为二分结局,CPAP不依从定义为平均每晚使用时间<4小时。使用爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)评估嗜睡情况。共纳入1461例患者(中位年龄67岁(四分位间距Q1-Q3;60-74岁);27.6%为女性)。8.3%的参与者报告有气吞症。与无气吞症的患者相比,受影响的患者更年轻,女性更常见,且体重指数更低。有气吞症的患者报告的ESS中位评分为7(4-10),而无气吞症的患者为5(3-8)(P<0.001)。气吞症组的CPAP使用时间显著更低(中位时间6.37小时/天对6.75小时/天;P=0.001),而两组间的不依从情况无显著差异(10.7%对7.5%;P=0.20)。对InterfaceVent研究的这项辅助分析突出了气吞症在接受CPAP治疗患者中的负担,并确定了可改变和不可改变的危险因素。更好地认识和管理这种报告不足的副作用可能会提高CPAP的依从性和患者舒适度。InterfaceVent已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03013283)。首次注册日期为2016年12月23日。