Maddaloni Luca, Bugani Ginevra, Fracella Matteo, Bitossi Camilla, D'Auria Alessandra, Aloisi Francesca, Azri Abir, Santinelli Letizia, Ben M'Hadheb Manel, Pierangeli Alessandra, Frasca Federica, Scagnolari Carolina
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Laboratory of Virology, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Microorganisms. 2025 Sep 17;13(9):2176. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13092176.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which play a vital role in triggering innate immune responses such as the production of type I and III interferons (IFNs). While modest PRR activation helps to defend against SARS-CoV-2, excessive or sustained activation can cause harmful inflammation and contribute to severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Altered expression of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which are among the most important members of the PRR family members, particularly TLRs 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9, has been strongly linked to COVID-19 severity. Furthermore, retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), collectively known as RLRs (RIG-I-like receptors), act as sensors that detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The expression of these receptors, as well as that of different DNA sensors, varies in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Changes in PRR expression, particularly that of TLRs, cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), and the stimulator of interferon genes (STING), have also been shown to play a role in the development and persistence of long COVID (LC). However, SARS-CoV-2 has evolved strategies to evade PRR recognition and subsequent signaling pathway activation, contributing to the IFN response dysregulation observed in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Nevertheless, PRR agonists and antagonists remain promising therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 infection. This review aims to describe the PRRs involved in recognizing SARS-CoV-2, explore their expression during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and examine their role in determining the severity of both COVID-19 and long-term manifestations of the disease. It also describes the strategies developed by SARS-CoV-2 to evade PRR recognition and activation. Moreover, given the considerable interest in modulating PRR activity as a novel immunotherapy approach, this review will provide a description of PRR agonists and antagonists that have been investigated as antiviral strategies against SARS-CoV-2. This review aims to explore the complex interplay between PRRs and SARS-CoV-2 in depth, considering its implications for prognostic biomarkers, targeted therapeutic strategies and the mechanistic understanding of long LC. Additionally, it outlines future perspectives that could help to address knowledge gaps in PRR-mediated responses during SARS-CoV-2 infection.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)可被模式识别受体(PRR)识别,这些受体在触发先天性免疫反应(如I型和III型干扰素(IFN)的产生)中起着至关重要的作用。适度的PRR激活有助于抵御SARS-CoV-2,但过度或持续激活会导致有害炎症,并导致严重的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。Toll样受体(TLR)是PRR家族中最重要的成员之一,其表达改变,特别是TLR 2、3、4、7、8和9,与COVID-19的严重程度密切相关。此外,视黄酸诱导基因I(RIG-I)和黑色素瘤分化相关蛋白5(MDA5)统称为RLR(RIG-I样受体),作为检测SARS-CoV-2 RNA的传感器。这些受体以及不同DNA传感器的表达在感染SARS-CoV-2的患者中有所不同。PRR表达的变化,特别是TLR、环磷酸鸟苷-腺苷酸合酶(cGAS)和干扰素基因刺激物(STING)的表达变化,也被证明在长期新冠(LC)的发展和持续存在中起作用。然而,SARS-CoV-2已经进化出逃避PRR识别和随后信号通路激活的策略,导致在感染SARS-CoV-2的患者中观察到IFN反应失调。尽管如此,PRR激动剂和拮抗剂仍然是SARS-CoV-2感染有前景的治疗靶点。本综述旨在描述参与识别SARS-CoV-2的PRR,探讨它们在SARS-CoV-2感染期间的表达,并研究它们在确定COVID-19严重程度和该疾病长期表现中的作用。它还描述了SARS-CoV-2为逃避PRR识别和激活而开发的策略。此外,鉴于将调节PRR活性作为一种新型免疫治疗方法的兴趣浓厚,本综述将介绍已被研究作为抗SARS-CoV-2抗病毒策略的PRR激动剂和拮抗剂。本综述旨在深入探讨PRR与SARS-CoV-2之间的复杂相互作用,考虑其对预后生物标志物、靶向治疗策略和长期LC机制理解的影响。此外,它概述了未来的前景,这可能有助于解决SARS-CoV-2感染期间PRR介导反应中的知识空白。