Akuc Tasan Cigdem, Balci Seyma Nilgun, Turgut Vildan, Cakir Gaye Nur, Tekce Neslihan
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Basiskele, Kocaeli, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 26;25(1):1440. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06801-w.
To evaluate the effect of fiber-reinforced composites on fracture-strength (FS) values of nanoceramic CAD/CAM restoration materials with different thicknesses.
One-hundred extracted, caries-free human maxillary premolars were divided into two main groups based on the thickness of the nanoceramic CAD/CAM restorative material (2 mm and 3 mm). Within each main group, five subgroups were formed: one control, one non-fiber (G-ænial Universal Flo), and three fiber-reinforced experimental subgroups (Ribbond, EverStick NET, and EverX Flow). Standardized MOD cavities were prepared in all experimental groups, extending 2 mm below the cementoenamel junction and 3 mm wide on the proximal walls. All restorations were fabricated using Cerasmart blocks and cemented with G-CEM Link Force dual-cure resin cement. FS testing was performed, and the data were statistically analysed (p < 0.05).
Ribbond significantly increased fracture resistance compared to the control group (p = 0.047), while other fiber materials showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). An increase in restorative material thickness enhanced fracture resistance in fiber-reinforced groups (p < 0.001). In the control group, variation in the remaining tooth structure height did not significantly affect fracture resistance (p = 0.078). There was also no significant difference in the interaction between the fiber-reinforced composite type and restoration thickness (p>0.05).
Although the thickness of the restorative material may influence FS, the use of fiber-reinforced composites does not appear to significantly affect the fracture resistance of nanoceramic CAD/CAM restorations.
评估纤维增强复合材料对不同厚度的纳米陶瓷计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)修复材料断裂强度(FS)值的影响。
根据纳米陶瓷CAD/CAM修复材料的厚度(2毫米和3毫米),将100颗拔除的无龋人类上颌前磨牙分为两个主要组。在每个主要组内,形成五个亚组:一个对照组、一个非纤维组(G-ænial Universal Flo)和三个纤维增强实验组(Ribbond、EverStick NET和EverX Flow)。在所有实验组中制备标准化的近中-牙合-远中(MOD)洞形,洞深至牙骨质牙釉质界下方2毫米,近中壁宽3毫米。所有修复体均使用Cerasmart块制作,并用G-CEM Link Force双固化树脂水门汀粘结。进行FS测试,并对数据进行统计学分析(p < 0.05)。
与对照组相比,Ribbond显著提高了抗折性(p = 0.047),而其他纤维材料无显著差异(p > 0.05)。修复材料厚度的增加增强了纤维增强组的抗折性(p < 0.001)。在对照组中,剩余牙体结构高度的变化对抗折性无显著影响(p = 0.078)。纤维增强复合材料类型与修复体厚度之间的相互作用也无显著差异(p > 0.05)。
尽管修复材料的厚度可能会影响FS,但纤维增强复合材料的使用似乎并未显著影响纳米陶瓷CAD/CAM修复体的抗折性。