Kouwenberg L H J A, Wijnhoven A M, Cohen E S, Hehenkamp W J K, Weiland N H Sperna, Kringos D S
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Sep 26;23(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01386-w.
The crossing of planetary boundaries, such as climate change and biosphere integrity, threatens human health, while healthcare systems paradoxically contribute substantially to these environmental challenges. Although research on the environmental impact of care activities and pathways is expanding, it remains unclear how this information is used in clinical practice. This study explores healthcare professionals' views on the environmental impact of hospital care, the role of environmental impact data and research and implementation priorities to support sustainability in clinical practice.
Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted between April and July 2024 with 31 Dutch healthcare professionals working across 12 medical (hospital) specialities with the highest care volumes and expenditures. Participants were selected on the basis of their involvement or interest in green healthcare initiatives. Focus groups and interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Participants have a general sense of environmentally impactful care activities, including surgical procedures, medication and outpatient visits. However, they reported a lack of quantitative environmental impact data at the clinical level, limiting their ability to make informed, sustainable choices. While participants recognized multiple uses for environmental impact data and supported integrating sustainability considerations into healthcare decision-making, they emphasized the need to balance these factors with other priorities, such as clinical effectiveness, patient safety and costs. Several research gaps were identified, including the need for comparative pathway analyses and standardized metrics. Additionally, implementation priorities, such as focusing on high-volume care, leveraging healthcare co-benefits and driving systemic changes to overcome barriers in the sustainability transition, were defined.
Healthcare professionals lack the quantitative data needed for sustainable healthcare decision-making. Targeted research and implementation efforts should focus on high-impact, modifiable care. These findings may support better alignment between environmental research and clinical priorities, thereby informing evidence-based sustainability efforts in hospital care.
跨越行星边界,如气候变化和生物多样性完整性,威胁着人类健康,而医疗保健系统却反常地对这些环境挑战做出了重大贡献。尽管关于医疗活动和路径对环境影响的研究正在不断扩展,但目前尚不清楚这些信息在临床实践中是如何被运用的。本研究探讨了医疗保健专业人员对医院护理环境影响的看法、环境影响数据的作用以及支持临床实践可持续性的研究与实施重点。
2024年4月至7月,对31名荷兰医疗保健专业人员进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈,这些人员分布在12个医疗(医院)专科领域,这些专科的护理量和支出最高。参与者是根据他们对绿色医疗倡议的参与程度或兴趣来挑选的。焦点小组访谈和个人访谈均逐字记录,并采用反思性主题分析法进行分析。
参与者对具有环境影响的护理活动有总体认识,包括外科手术、药物治疗和门诊就诊。然而,他们报告称临床层面缺乏定量的环境影响数据,这限制了他们做出明智的可持续选择的能力。虽然参与者认识到环境影响数据有多种用途,并支持将可持续性考虑因素纳入医疗保健决策,但他们强调需要在这些因素与其他优先事项之间取得平衡,如临床疗效、患者安全和成本。研究发现了几个差距,包括需要进行比较路径分析和标准化指标。此外,还确定了实施重点,如关注高流量护理、利用医疗保健的协同效益以及推动系统性变革以克服可持续性转型中的障碍。
医疗保健专业人员缺乏可持续医疗保健决策所需的定量数据。有针对性的研究和实施工作应聚焦于高影响、可调整的护理。这些发现可能有助于使环境研究与临床重点更好地保持一致,从而为医院护理中基于证据的可持续性努力提供参考。