• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管镜碎石术中铥光纤激光与钬激光在结石回推和结石移位方面的比较分析:真实世界数据

Comparative analysis of thulium fiber and holmium: YAG lasers on retropulsion and stone migration in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: real-world data.

作者信息

Bulut Ender Cem, Karabacak Nihat, Teke İrem Aleyna, Çetin Serhat, Küpeli Bora

机构信息

School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Oct 20;40(1):447. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04686-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10103-025-04686-3
PMID:41114902
Abstract

Laser lithotripsy, which is widely applied in treating urinary system stones, presents difficulties such as stone migration due to retropulsion, especially in upper ureteral stones. This study aims to compare the stone migration rates of conventional Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG), pulse modulated Ho:YAG, and Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) in patients undergoing laser lithotripsy. A retrospective analysis of 455 patients who underwent laser lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones between 01.01.2021 and 01.06.2025 at a tertiary hospital was conducted. The cohort was divided into three groups based on the laser used: conventional 30 W Ho:YAG (Group A), pulse-modulated 65 W Ho:YAG (Group B), and TFL (Group C). Data on stone migration, operation time, laser-on time, and stone-free rates (SFR) were collected and analyzed. Significant differences in stone migration rates were observed, with Group C showing the lowest migration rate (7.8%) compared to Groups A (28.9%) and B (16.8%) (p < 0.001). TFL also resulted in significantly higher SFRs (97.1%) compared to conventional Ho:YAG laser (86.8%) (p = 0.002). Additionally, TFL reduced the need for auxiliary procedures, with only 2.9% of patients requiring flexible ureteroscopy, compared to 12.2% in Group A and 9.7% in Group B (p = 0.032). TFL significantly reduces stone migration and improves stone-free rates compared to conventional and pulse-modulated Ho:YAG lasers. Its clinical and economic benefits, including reduced need for auxiliary procedures and shorter operation times, suggest TFL as a promising alternative for upper ureteral stone treatment. Further large-scale, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

摘要

激光碎石术在泌尿系统结石治疗中应用广泛,但存在诸如因结石回推导致的结石移位等困难,尤其是在上段输尿管结石治疗中。本研究旨在比较接受激光碎石术的患者中,传统钬激光(Ho:YAG)、脉冲调制钬激光和铥光纤激光(TFL)的结石移位率。对一家三级医院在2021年1月1日至2025年6月1日期间接受上段输尿管结石激光碎石术的455例患者进行了回顾性分析。根据所使用的激光将队列分为三组:传统30W钬激光(A组)、脉冲调制65W钬激光(B组)和铥光纤激光(C组)。收集并分析了结石移位、手术时间、激光照射时间和结石清除率(SFR)的数据。观察到结石移位率存在显著差异,C组的移位率最低(7.8%),而A组为(28.9%),B组为(16.8%)(p<0.001)。与传统钬激光(86.8%)相比,铥光纤激光的结石清除率也显著更高(97.1%)(p = 0.002)。此外,铥光纤激光减少了辅助手术的需求,只有2.9%的患者需要软性输尿管镜检查,而A组为12.2%,B组为9.7%(p = 0.032)。与传统和脉冲调制钬激光相比,铥光纤激光显著降低了结石移位并提高了结石清除率。其临床和经济效益,包括减少辅助手术需求和缩短手术时间,表明铥光纤激光是上段输尿管结石治疗的一种有前景的替代方法。需要进一步的大规模前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of thulium fiber and holmium: YAG lasers on retropulsion and stone migration in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: real-world data.输尿管镜碎石术中铥光纤激光与钬激光在结石回推和结石移位方面的比较分析:真实世界数据
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Oct 20;40(1):447. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04686-3.
2
Outcomes of holmium: YAG laser vs. Thulium fiber laser for ureteric stones during ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy - a prospective, randomized single-centre study.输尿管镜碎石术中钬激光与铥光纤激光治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较——一项前瞻性、随机单中心研究
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 12;43(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05568-7.
3
Comparison of thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney Stone treatment: A randomized prospective study.钬激光与铥激光在逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石中的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2025 Jul 7:501808. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501808.
4
Prospective evaluation of efficacy, safety, cumulative laser energy, and stone-free rates in the post-market SOLTIVE SuperPulsed laser system registry: insights from team of worldwide endourological researchers' (T.O.W.E.R.) research consortium.上市后SOLTIVE超脉冲激光系统注册研究中疗效、安全性、累积激光能量及无石率的前瞻性评估:来自全球腔内泌尿外科研究团队(T.O.W.E.R.)研究联盟的见解
Urolithiasis. 2025 Mar 23;53(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01720-5.
5
In vitro comparative analysis of ablation volume and energy requirements for 1 mm³ stone ablation using ho: YAG, p-Tm: YAG, and TFL lasers.
Urolithiasis. 2025 Oct 13;53(1):194. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01866-2.
6
Thulium Fiber Laser versus Vapor Tunnel HO:YAG laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one has better laser ablation performance?铥光纤激光与蒸汽通道钬激光在逆行性肾内手术中的比较:哪一种具有更好的激光消融性能?
World J Urol. 2025 Aug 2;43(1):472. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05852-6.
7
Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Thulium Fiber vs Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser Lithotripsy in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease Using a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath: Results From a Prospective, Multicenter Study of the EAU Section of Endourology.使用可弯曲导航吸引输尿管鞘的钬光纤与脉冲钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术在软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石疾病中的倾向评分匹配分析:欧洲泌尿外科学会内镜泌尿学部前瞻性多中心研究结果
Urology. 2025 May;199:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.01.065. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
8
Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.钬激光与铥光纤激光碎石术治疗结石的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2024 Jun;85(6):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
9
Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.钬激光与铥光纤激光治疗输尿管镜碎石术的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2022 Jul;82(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
10
Magneto Ho:YAG laser versus Thulium Fiber Laser for laser lithotripsy during flexible ureteroscopy with a flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Oct 10. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04819-1.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison between vapor tunnel and virtual basket for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones using holmium:YAG laser (Cyber Ho): which is the best tool to reduce retropulsion?钬激光(Cyber Ho)治疗输尿管上段结石中蒸汽隧道与虚拟篮筐的比较:哪种工具能更好地减少后向推力?
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 20;42(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04961-y.
2
Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.了解钬:YAG 和掺铥光纤激光器的消融率。一项体外研究的观点。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Jan 17;51(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01402-6.
3
A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial.
钬激光光纤碎石术(Fiber Dust)与微创经皮肾镜取石术(min iPerc)治疗 10~20mm 肾结石的随机对照研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2555-2560. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04133-w. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
4
Ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy results in shorter operating times and large cost savings.输尿管镜钬光纤激光碎石术可缩短手术时间,节约大量成本。
World J Urol. 2022 Aug;40(8):2077-2082. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04037-9. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Comparison of stone retropulsion between Moses mode and virtual basket mode: an in vitro study using artificial stones.Moses 模式与虚拟篮筐模式下结石后向运动的比较:应用人工结石的体外研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):493-499. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01335-0. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
6
Thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser for stone lithotripsy during mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized trial.铥光纤激光与钬:钇铝石榴石激光用于微创经皮肾镜取石术中的结石碎石术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):42-47. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_331_21. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
7
Stone ablation rates using innovative pulse modulation technology: Vapor tunnel, virtual basket, and bubble blast. An in vitro experimental study.采用创新脉冲调制技术的结石消融率:蒸汽隧道、虚拟篮筐和气泡爆破。一项体外实验研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Apr;54(4):580-587. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23503. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
New Lasers for Stone Treatment.新型激光碎石治疗技术
Urol Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;49(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
9
"VirtualBasket" ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes.“VirtualBasket”输尿管镜钬激光碎石术:术中及早期术后结果。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Jun;74(3):344-350. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04025-X. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.激光碎石术中的后冲力——体外比较钬设备与新型脉冲固态铥激光的研究。
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3651-3656. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8. Epub 2021 Mar 23.