Suppr超能文献

改良倒置内界膜瓣技术治疗板层黄斑裂孔

Modified inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for lamellar macular hole.

作者信息

Keyal Khusbu, Bing Li, Chunyu Liu, Zhongping Tian, Shao Yuting, Yanlong Bi

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Oct 21;25(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04359-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lamellar macular hole (LMH) is a partial-thickness macular defect thought to be caused by vitreofoveal traction, anteroposterior and tangential forces exerting traction on the fovea.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study involving 19 eyes. 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), fovea sparing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling combined with modified inverted ILM flap under air for treatment of LMH was used.

RESULTS

The study comprised 14 females and 5 males, involving 13 right and 6 left eyes, with a mean age of 69.52 ± 8.13 years. Symptom duration averaged 498.94 ± 646.96 days. The preoperative residual foveal thickness, which initially averaged 62.26 ± 46.21 μm, increased to a post-operative central foveal thickness of 85.05 ± 48.11 μm after 6 months. Foveal configuration was improved in 15 of 19 eyes (78.94%), one patient had persistent macular edema, and 3 eyes had irregular foveal contour. Among 19 eyes examined, 13 eyes (68.42%) showed intact external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) lines both before and after the surgery, resulting in a smooth restoration of the foveal contour. Conversely, in 6 eyes (31.57%) assessed before the operation, the ELM and EZ lines were disrupted. Of these, 3 eyes (15.78%) exhibited improvement, while in the remaining 3 eyes (15.78%), the ELM and EZ lines remained disrupted even after 6 months of follow-up. The mean pre-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in LogMAR was 0.66 ± 0.43 and the mean post-operative BCVA in LogMAR at 1 months was 0.55 ± 0.24, at 3 months was 0.53 ± 0.25 and at 6 months was 0.51 ± 0.24, indicating an overall improvement in BCVA compared to pre-operative levels. Mean BCVA improved from 0.66 ± 0.43 logMAR pre-operative to 0.51 ± 0.24 logMAR at 6 months post-operatively (p = 0.058). There were no instances of full thickness macular hole and no foveal detachment.

CONCLUSION

PPV with fovea sparing ILM peeling combined with modified inverted ILM flap under air results in good morphological and functional outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study project registration number (Tongji Hospital affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine (Number: K-W-2024-001)).

摘要

背景

板层黄斑裂孔(LMH)是一种黄斑部的部分厚度缺损,被认为是由玻璃体黄斑牵引、前后向和切向力对黄斑区施加牵引所致。

方法

这是一项涉及19只眼的回顾性研究。采用25G经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)、保留黄斑中心凹的内界膜(ILM)剥除术联合气下改良倒置ILM瓣治疗LMH。

结果

该研究纳入14名女性和5名男性,涉及13只右眼和6只左眼,平均年龄为69.52±8.13岁。症状持续时间平均为498.94±646.96天。术前黄斑中心凹残余厚度最初平均为62.26±46.21μm,6个月后术后中心凹厚度增加至85.05±48.11μm。19只眼中有15只(78.94%)黄斑形态得到改善,1例患者持续存在黄斑水肿,3只眼黄斑中心凹轮廓不规则。在检查的19只眼中,13只眼(68.42%)手术前后外界膜(ELM)和椭圆体带(EZ)线完整,黄斑中心凹轮廓得以平滑恢复。相反,术前评估的6只眼(31.57%)中,ELM和EZ线中断。其中,3只眼(15.78%)有所改善,而其余3只眼(15.78%)即使在随访6个月后ELM和EZ线仍中断。术前平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的LogMAR值为0.66±0.43,术后1个月的平均BCVA的LogMAR值为0.55±0.24,3个月时为0.53±0.25,6个月时为0.51±0.24,表明BCVA与术前水平相比总体有所改善。平均BCVA从术前的0.66±0.43 logMAR提高到术后6个月的0.51±0.24 logMAR(p=0.058)。未出现全层黄斑裂孔和黄斑脱离的情况。

结论

PPV联合保留黄斑中心凹的ILM剥除术及气下改良倒置ILM瓣可取得良好的形态和功能预后。

试验注册

该研究项目注册号(同济大学附属同济医院(编号:K-W-2024-001))。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc1c/12539082/d4cf0e1d4c11/12886_2025_4359_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

6
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for full-thickness macular holes in Black Africans.
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Oct 3;45(1):405. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03757-2.

本文引用的文献

3
Natural History and Surgical Outcomes of Lamellar Macular Holes.板层黄斑裂孔的自然史和手术结果。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 Mar;8(3):210-222. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.09.016. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
8
Novel approaches to the assessment and treatment of lamellar macular hole.层状黄斑裂孔的评估和治疗新方法。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep;100(6):e1287-e1297. doi: 10.1111/aos.15078. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验