• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Australia's First Peoples: hunters of extinct megafauna or Australia's first fossil collectors.澳大利亚的原住民:已灭绝巨型动物的捕猎者还是澳大利亚最早的化石收集者。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Oct 22;12(10):250078. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250078. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
3
Mid Forehead Brow Lift额中眉提升术
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
6
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
7
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconstructing Pleistocene Australian herbivore megafauna diet using calcium and strontium isotopes.利用钙和锶同位素重建更新世澳大利亚食草动物巨型动物群的饮食。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Nov 22;10(11):230991. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230991. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Ancient proteins resolve controversy over the identity of eggshell.古蛋白解决了蛋壳身份的争议。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 25;119(43):e2109326119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109326119. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Egg Incubation Mechanics of Giant Birds.大型鸟类的卵孵化机制
Biology (Basel). 2021 Aug 1;10(8):738. doi: 10.3390/biology10080738.
4
Extinction of eastern Sahul megafauna coincides with sustained environmental deterioration.东亚澳大拉西亚巨型动物群的灭绝与持续的环境恶化相一致。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 18;11(1):2250. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15785-w.
5
Climate-human interaction associated with southeast Australian megafauna extinction patterns.与东南澳大利亚巨型动物灭绝模式相关的气候-人类相互作用。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 22;10(1):5311. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13277-0.
6
Seasonal migration of marsupial megafauna in Pleistocene Sahul (Australia-New Guinea).更新世萨胡尔(澳大利亚-新几内亚)有袋类巨型动物的季节性迁徙。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 27;284(1863). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0785.
7
Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago.6.5 万年前人类已在澳大利亚北部居住。
Nature. 2017 Jul 19;547(7663):306-310. doi: 10.1038/nature22968.
8
Cultural innovation and megafauna interaction in the early settlement of arid Australia.干旱澳大利亚早期定居点的文化创新与巨型动物群相互作用。
Nature. 2016 Nov 10;539(7628):280-283. doi: 10.1038/nature20125. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
9
What caused extinction of the Pleistocene megafauna of Sahul?是什么导致了萨胡尔更新世巨型动物的灭绝?
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2399.
10
Human predation contributed to the extinction of the Australian megafaunal bird Genyornis newtoni ∼47 ka.人类的捕猎导致了澳大利亚巨型动物鸟类牛顿巨鸟在约4.7万年前灭绝。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 29;7:10496. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10496.

澳大利亚的原住民:已灭绝巨型动物的捕猎者还是澳大利亚最早的化石收集者。

Australia's First Peoples: hunters of extinct megafauna or Australia's first fossil collectors.

作者信息

Archer Michael, Akerman Kim, DeSantis Larisa, Dickson Blake Vermeer, Hand Suzanne, Hatcher Lindsay, Hellstrom John C, Jacobsen Geraldine, Louys Julien, Price Gilbert James, Ryan Helen, Sniderman Kale, Travouillon Kenny, Woodhead Jon

机构信息

School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

University of New South Wales, Moonah, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Oct 22;12(10):250078. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250078. eCollection 2025 Oct.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.250078
PMID:41127799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12539957/
Abstract

Claims have been made about the presumed role of Australia's First Peoples in the extinction of some of Australia's megafauna. However, evidence used to suggest butchering may instead demonstrate fossil collection by Australia's First Peoples. Using micro-computed tomography scanning and microscopic wear analysis, we analysed a cut sthenurine tibia from Mammoth Cave, Western Australia, previously interpreted as evidence of butchering. Our analyses suggest the cut occurred long after death and probably after fossilization. We investigated the possibility of long-distance transportation of a premolar of gifted by First Peoples in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. This species is otherwise unknown from northern Australia but common in southern Australia. Using X-ray fluorescence, we tested the potential provenance of the premolar and found that it was elementally indistinguishable from Mammoth Cave premolars. These results suggest that First Peoples may have collected fossils in southern Australia before carrying them to the Kimberley region. A review of other recent claims of killing and/or butchering of extinct megafaunal species suggests they too may have been collected as fossils. We argue that fossils were valued, being collected and transported long distances by the First Peoples in Australia in all probability thousands of years before Europeans arrived on this continent.

摘要

关于澳大利亚原住民在澳大利亚一些巨型动物灭绝过程中可能扮演的角色,一直存在各种说法。然而,那些用以表明存在屠宰行为的证据,反而可能证明是澳大利亚原住民进行了化石采集。我们利用微计算机断层扫描和微观磨损分析,对来自西澳大利亚猛犸洞的一根已切割的袋熊胫骨进行了分析,该胫骨此前被解读为屠宰证据。我们的分析表明,切割发生在动物死亡很久之后,可能是在化石形成之后。我们调查了西澳大利亚金伯利地区原住民赠送的一颗前磨牙长距离运输的可能性。该物种在澳大利亚北部其他地方并不为人所知,但在澳大利亚南部很常见。利用X射线荧光分析,我们测试了这颗前磨牙的潜在来源,发现它在元素组成上与猛犸洞的前磨牙无法区分。这些结果表明,原住民可能在澳大利亚南部采集了化石,然后将它们带到了金伯利地区。对最近其他关于已灭绝巨型动物物种被猎杀和/或屠宰的说法进行的审查表明,它们也可能是作为化石被采集的。我们认为,在欧洲人抵达这片大陆之前,很可能在数千年前,澳大利亚原住民就重视化石,并对其进行长途采集和运输。