Suppr超能文献

一股不可小觑的(咬)合力。

A (Bite) Force to Be Reckoned With.

作者信息

Laird Myra F, Holmes Megan A, Terhune Claire E, Taylor Andrea B

机构信息

Department of Basic and Translational Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Biol Anthropol. 2025 Oct;188(2):e70144. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.70144.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bite force has received significant attention in biological anthropology, but maximum bite force estimates for a single primate species often span hundreds of newtons. In this synthesis, we discuss the definitions of maximum bite force, review and highlight the variability in methods used to assess bite force in primates, and compare bite force ranges in macaques to bracket maximum force estimates between physiological and mechanical maxima.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Methods of estimating bite force in primates were gathered from the literature along with published estimates of maximum bite force for macaques (Macaca sp.).

RESULTS

Maximum bite force can be defined physiologically or mechanically, and methods of estimating bite force can be grouped as in vivo, muscle-based, and craniodental within these two definitions. Physiological estimates occur under natural conditions modulated by sensorimotor feedback, whereas mechanical maximum bite forces ignore muscular and neural limitations. Published maximum bite forces for macaques at the molars vary from 127 N to 898 N, a 771 N range. Using a bracketing approach suggested here, we narrow the estimated bite force range at the incisors to 487-503 N and 503-898 N for the molars.

DISCUSSION

This synthesis emphasizes the need for comparisons between in vivo, muscle-based, and craniodental bite force methods in living primates. We propose bracketing bite force estimates between physiological and mechanical maxima in order to provide more reliable bite force estimates and improve understanding of how bite force relates to primate functional morphology and feeding ecology.

摘要

目的

咬合力在生物人类学中受到了广泛关注,但对单个灵长类物种最大咬合力的估计通常跨度可达数百牛顿。在本综述中,我们讨论了最大咬合力的定义,回顾并强调了用于评估灵长类动物咬合力的方法的变异性,并比较了猕猴的咬合力范围,以界定生理最大值和机械最大值之间的最大力估计值。

材料与方法

从文献中收集了估计灵长类动物咬合力的方法以及已发表的猕猴(猕猴属)最大咬合力估计值。

结果

最大咬合力可从生理或机械角度定义,在这两种定义下,估计咬合力的方法可分为体内法、基于肌肉法和颅牙法。生理估计是在由感觉运动反馈调节的自然条件下进行的,而机械最大咬合力则忽略了肌肉和神经的限制。已发表的猕猴臼齿最大咬合力在127牛至898牛之间,相差771牛。采用本文建议的界定方法,我们将门牙的估计咬合力范围缩小至487 - 503牛,臼齿的估计咬合力范围为503 - 898牛。

讨论

本综述强调了对现存灵长类动物体内法、基于肌肉法和颅牙咬合力方法进行比较的必要性。我们建议在生理最大值和机械最大值之间界定咬合力估计值,以便提供更可靠的咬合力估计,并增进对咬合力与灵长类动物功能形态和觅食生态之间关系的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ac/12568753/89d6803a5ae2/AJPA-188-e70144-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A (Bite) Force to Be Reckoned With.一股不可小觑的(咬)合力。
Am J Biol Anthropol. 2025 Oct;188(2):e70144. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.70144.
5
Bite force and occlusal stress production in hominin evolution.在人类进化过程中的咬合力和咬合压力产生。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013 Aug;151(4):544-57. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22296. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
6
Determining primates bite force from histological tooth sections.从组织学牙齿切片确定灵长类动物的咬合力。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Apr;171(4):683-703. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24003. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Scaling of Anatomically Derived Maximal Bite Force in Primates.灵长类动物解剖衍生最大咬合力的缩放。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2020 Jul;303(7):2026-2035. doi: 10.1002/ar.24284. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

5
6
Introduction: food processing and nutritional assimilation in animals.简介:动物的食物加工和营养吸收。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Dec 4;378(1891):20220559. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0559. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
10
3D Muscle Architecture of the Pectoral Muscles of European Starling ().欧洲椋鸟胸肌的三维肌肉结构()。
Integr Org Biol. 2019 Feb 1;1(1):oby010. doi: 10.1093/iob/oby010. eCollection 2019.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验