Trybulski Robert, Kużdzał Adrian, Lupu Gabriel Stanica, Kuczmik Wacław, Biolik Grzegorz, Derengowska Magdalena Hagner, Taradaj Jakub
Medical Department Wojciech Korfanty, Upper Silesian Academy in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Provita Żory Medical Center, Żory, Poland.
PLoS One. 2025 Nov 6;20(11):e0335931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335931. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to investigate how body position (supine, seated, and standing) influences post-occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) and autonomic nervous system activity, with implications for vascular health and the safety of blood flow-restricted (BFR) exercise. A prospective, within-subject design was implemented. Fifteen healthy participants (18-30 years) were evaluated across three experimental sessions. Each session involved one randomized body position. Arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), microcirculatory responses (resting flow [RF], biological zero [BZ], time to peak [TP], recovery time [TR]), and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters-average normal-to-normal interval (AVNN), standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), low-frequency/high-frequency power ratio (LF/HF), and heart rate (HR)-were recorded using laser Doppler flowmetry, Doppler ultrasound, and Polar H10 chest sensors. Standing and sitting positions significantly increased AOP min and AOP 100% compared to supine (p = 0.003, r ≥ 0.62). Resting flow and BZ values were also significantly elevated in these upright positions (sitting and standing) (p = 0.003). Time to peak and recovery time were longest in the standing position (p = 0.003-0.009). HRV analyses revealed a significant decrease in AVNN from supine to sitting and standing (p = 0.003), while SDNN and LF/HF increased in upright positions (sitting and standing) (p < 0.013). Heart rate was significantly higher in standing vs. sitting (p = 0.006), but not between supine and sitting (p = 0.459). Body position markedly influences both microcirculatory dynamics and autonomic nervous system responses. Upright positions (sitting and standing) elevate AOP and alter HRV, suggesting increased vascular and sympathetic activity. These findings are critical for optimizing BFR protocols and assessing cardiovascular safety during postural changes.
本研究旨在探讨身体姿势(仰卧、坐姿和站姿)如何影响闭塞后反应性充血(PORH)和自主神经系统活动,这对血管健康和血流限制(BFR)运动的安全性具有重要意义。采用前瞻性、受试者内设计。对15名健康参与者(18 - 30岁)进行了三个实验阶段的评估。每个阶段涉及一种随机分配的身体姿势。使用激光多普勒血流仪、多普勒超声和Polar H10胸部传感器记录动脉闭塞压力(AOP)、微循环反应(静息血流[RF]、生物学零值[BZ]、峰值时间[TP]、恢复时间[TR])以及心率变异性(HRV)参数——平均正常到正常间期(AVNN)、正常到正常间期的标准差(SDNN)、低频/高频功率比(LF/HF)和心率(HR)。与仰卧位相比,站立位和坐位显著增加了AOP最小值和AOP 100%(p = 0.003,r≥0.62)。在这些直立姿势(坐姿和站姿)下,静息血流和BZ值也显著升高(p = 0.003)。站立位的峰值时间和恢复时间最长(p = 0.003 - 0.009)。HRV分析显示,从仰卧位到坐位和站立位,AVNN显著降低(p = 0.003),而SDNN和LF/HF在直立姿势(坐姿和站姿)下增加(p < 0.013)。站立位的心率显著高于坐位(p = 0.006),但仰卧位和坐位之间无显著差异(p = 0.459)。身体姿势显著影响微循环动力学和自主神经系统反应。直立姿势(坐姿和站姿)会升高AOP并改变HRV,表明血管和交感神经活动增加。这些发现对于优化BFR方案以及评估姿势变化期间的心血管安全性至关重要。