Suppr超能文献

早期定期筛查、诊断和治疗(EPSDT)是否值得?

Is early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (EPSDT) worthwhile?

作者信息

Currier R

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1977 Nov-Dec;92(6):527-36.

Abstract

The State and Federal governments invest many tax dollars to provide health screening for millions of Medicaid families. Justification for such investment is based on the experience of Sweden's screening of 4-year-old children, a University of Texas Health Service Center study on cost benefit of EPSDT, and the Michigan experience. In Sweden's health screening program, health problems of functional importance were found in 21.6% of the screenees, and 71.8% of these were newly discovered by the screening. The results of Texas study indicated that an effective EPSDT program would result in a savings of $43 billion in 1976 currency over a 20-year period. In Michigan, a drop of 13% occurred in the referral rate for health problems during a 6-month period among those who were screened a second time or more.

摘要

州政府和联邦政府投入了大量税款,为数百万医疗补助家庭提供健康筛查。进行这种投资的依据是瑞典对4岁儿童进行筛查的经验、德克萨斯大学健康服务中心关于早期和定期筛查、诊断与治疗计划(EPSDT)成本效益的一项研究,以及密歇根州的经验。在瑞典的健康筛查项目中,21.6%的受筛查者被发现存在具有功能重要性的健康问题,其中71.8%是通过筛查新发现的。德克萨斯州研究的结果表明,一个有效的EPSDT项目在20年期间将节省1976年货币价值的430亿美元。在密歇根州,那些接受过两次或更多次筛查的人在6个月期间因健康问题的转诊率下降了13%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2da4/1432066/811d36e4f4ca/pubhealthrep00145-0034-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验