Barry A L, Effinger L J
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Oct;6(4):452-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.6.4.452.
Two standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods were compared using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and members of the Enterobacteriaceae. The standard Bauer-Kirby method and the agar overlay method of Barry et al. were compared using carbenicillin (50- and 100-mug disks), gentamicin, polymyxin B, and colistin sulfate. Both methods gave nearly comparable zone sizes with the enteric bacilli. However, with P. aeruginosa the agar overlay method gave zones 1 to 2 mm smaller than the Bauer-Kirby method with all drugs except gentamicin. In spite of these small differences, further examination of minimal inhibitory concentration-zone size correlations indicated that the same interpretive zone standards can be applied to either diffusion technique. For testing carbenicillin against Pseudomonas sp., 50-mug disks were unsatisfactory, especially with the agar overlay method; 100-mug disks were far superior with both methods.
使用铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌科细菌对两种标准化纸片扩散药敏试验方法进行了比较。采用羧苄西林(50微克和100微克纸片)、庆大霉素、多粘菌素B和硫酸黏菌素,对标准的鲍尔-柯比方法和巴里等人的琼脂覆盖法进行了比较。两种方法对肠道杆菌得出的抑菌圈大小几乎相当。然而,对于铜绿假单胞菌,除庆大霉素外,琼脂覆盖法对所有药物得出的抑菌圈比鲍尔-柯比方法小1至2毫米。尽管存在这些细微差异,但对最低抑菌浓度与抑菌圈大小相关性的进一步研究表明,相同的解释性抑菌圈标准可应用于任何一种扩散技术。对于检测羧苄西林对假单胞菌属的药敏,50微克纸片并不理想,尤其是采用琼脂覆盖法时;100微克纸片在两种方法中都更具优势。