Fowler S C, Price A W
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978 Mar 1;56(2):211-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00431852.
Rats were reinforced with water on a continuous reinforcement schedule and were also punished with electric shock for every fifth response applied to a silent, isometric, force-sensing manipulandum. Oral doses of chlordiazepoxide (3.0, 9.0, 27.0 mg/kg) increased both conventional rate and force of punished responding. In contrast, d-amphetamine (0.8, 1.6, 3.2 mg/kg, by gavage) further decreased conventional rate and force of response, but this latter drug increased the rate of recorded responses that were lower than the 15-g force criterion for response consequences. The results for chlordiazepoxide are viewed in terms of its anxiolytic properties, while the d-amphetamine data appear to support a theory of amphetamine effects based on the concept of stereotyped behaviors.
大鼠在连续强化程序下用水进行强化,并且每当对一个无声、等长、力敏操作手柄做出第五次反应时就会受到电击惩罚。口服氯氮卓(3.0、9.0、27.0毫克/千克)会增加受惩罚反应的传统速率和力度。相比之下,右旋苯丙胺(0.8、1.6、3.2毫克/千克,通过灌胃)进一步降低了反应的传统速率和力度,但后一种药物增加了低于15克力反应标准的记录反应速率。氯氮卓的结果根据其抗焦虑特性来解读,而右旋苯丙胺的数据似乎支持基于刻板行为概念的苯丙胺效应理论。