Little J R, Eisen H N
J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):247-65. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.247.
(a) the failure to find an antibody subset that binds a cross-reacting ligand better than the comparable homologue in spite of the use of isolation methods that select for such antibody molecules; (b) the isolation of antibody subsets with virtually indistinguishable average intrinsic association constants for homologous and cross-reacting ligands, but which nevertheless have physical properties (Qmax and relative fluorescence coefficient) that readily distinguish these subsets according to their origin in response to antigenic stimulation with DNP- or with TNP-protein; (c) the demonstration, by precipitin reaction and measurement of association constants for homologous and cross-reacting haptens, of generally greater cross-reactivity among high affinity anti-DNP and anti-TNP antibodies, i.e. low affinity antibodies are generally more discriminating; (d) the selection of anti-DNP and anti-TNP antibody subsets that are distinctive in their ability to show spur formation in gel diffusion reactions with homologous and cross-reacting antigens. These results suggest that in the initial cellular response to antigenic stimulation, DNP-BgammaG and TNP-BgammaG stimulate virtually nonoverlapping sets of antigen-sensitive cells, despite the great similarity of these two immunogens. With prolonged stimulation this specificity wanes, giving rise to a more degenerate response evident in the greater cross-reactivity of the antibodies produced later in immunization.
(a) 尽管使用了选择此类抗体分子的分离方法,但未能找到一种与交叉反应配体结合比同类同源物更好的抗体亚群;(b) 分离出的抗体亚群对同源和交叉反应配体的平均内在缔合常数几乎无法区分,但它们具有物理性质(最大结合量和相对荧光系数),可根据其对DNP或TNP蛋白抗原刺激的反应来源轻松区分这些亚群;(c) 通过沉淀反应以及对同源和交叉反应半抗原缔合常数的测量表明,高亲和力抗DNP和抗TNP抗体之间的交叉反应性通常更强,即低亲和力抗体通常更具区分性;(d) 选择了抗DNP和抗TNP抗体亚群,它们在与同源和交叉反应抗原的凝胶扩散反应中形成刺的能力方面具有独特性。这些结果表明,在对抗原刺激的初始细胞反应中,尽管这两种免疫原非常相似,但DNP-BγG和TNP-BγG刺激的是几乎不重叠的抗原敏感细胞集。随着刺激时间延长,这种特异性减弱,导致在免疫后期产生的抗体具有更大的交叉反应性,从而出现更退化的反应。