Chow L P, Gruhn W, Chang W P
Am J Public Health. 1979 Mar;69(3):273-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.3.273.
A multiple answer model of Randomized Response Technique (known as Hopkins RRT Model II) was tried in a rural area (Nekempte) in Ethiopia to estimate the incidence of induced abortion among currently married women of childbearing age. In the RRT adopted here, the question on abortion--sensitive as it is--was preceded by two innocuous "practice questions". Despite the very low literacy level of the women, nearly all of them cooperated. The RRT estimates in regard to the two innocuous "practice questions" were fairly reasonable, while the RRT estimate of the rate of induced abortion (35 per cent) was far higher than that derived from direct reporting. The differentials in abortion rates by age and parity were consistent with expectation. A post RRT survey indicated that more than one-half (58 per cent) of the women found RRT "easy" or "moderately easy" to understand, while nearly 80 per cent of them thought that there was no "trick" involved in it.
在埃塞俄比亚的一个农村地区(内肯普特),尝试使用随机应答技术的多重答案模型(即霍普金斯随机应答模型II)来估计当前育龄已婚妇女中人工流产的发生率。在这里采用的随机应答技术中,关于堕胎的问题——尽管很敏感——之前有两个无害的“练习问题”。尽管这些妇女的识字水平很低,但几乎所有人都进行了合作。关于两个无害“练习问题”的随机应答技术估计相当合理,而人工流产率的随机应答技术估计值(35%)远高于直接报告得出的估计值。按年龄和胎次划分的流产率差异符合预期。随机应答技术调查后的一项调查表明,超过一半(58%)的妇女认为随机应答技术“容易”或“比较容易”理解,而近80%的妇女认为其中没有“猫腻”。