Liu P T, Chow L P
Biometrics. 1976 Sep;32(3):607-18.
It has been proven theoretically that repeated administration of two-related-question randomized response technique (RRT) substantially increases the efficiency by reducing the variance of the estimate. The realtive efficiency of RRT to direct question with various number of trials per respondent under various degrees of truthful response and various conditions has also been examined. However, if the respondent becomes more concerned about his anonymity, then the mean square error may be larger. A field study of limited scope conducted in Taichung, Taiwan indicated that this multiple trial RRT model is at least as feasible as, if not more feasible than, the conventional single trial RRT. There was no sign suggesting cooperation of respondents had deteriorated because each was asked to repeat the procedures three times. If the number of trials did not exceed three, we believe that the increase in the cost of survey and "exhaustion" of respondents from repeated administration of the same set of questions would be negligible. Hence, we believe that this multiple trial technique is a feasible and useful survey method for study of various contemporary social problems of sensitive nature. More field testing, particularly in different socio-cultural settings, is necessary however, before a general conclusion may be drawn.
理论上已经证明,重复使用双相关问题随机应答技术(RRT)通过降低估计值的方差可大幅提高效率。还研究了在不同真实回答程度和各种条件下,RRT相对于每个受访者进行不同次数试验的直接提问的相对效率。然而,如果受访者更加关注其匿名性,那么均方误差可能会更大。在台湾台中进行的一项范围有限的实地研究表明,这种多次试验RRT模型至少与传统的单次试验RRT一样可行,甚至可能更可行。没有迹象表明受访者的合作变差,因为每个受访者都被要求重复该程序三次。如果试验次数不超过三次,我们认为重复询问同一组问题导致的调查成本增加和受访者“疲劳”可以忽略不计。因此,我们认为这种多次试验技术是研究各种敏感性质当代社会问题的一种可行且有用的调查方法。然而,在得出一般性结论之前,还需要进行更多的实地测试,特别是在不同的社会文化背景下。