Suppr超能文献

静脉注射头孢拉定和头孢唑林治疗严重感染。

Intravenous use of cephradine and cefazolin against serious infections.

作者信息

Caloza D L, Semar R W, Bernfeld G E

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Jan;15(1):119-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.1.119.

Abstract

The relative efficacy and safety of cephradine and cefazolin were compared in 180 patients with a variety of serious infections caused by susceptible organisms. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups of 90 patients each. Most patients received 2 to 4 g per day, administered by intravenous injection in four equally divided doses, for a minimum of 4 days. Based on the clinical and microbiological results, the two cephalosporins were found to be comparable in therapeutic effectiveness. Toxicity was not a problem with either drug.

摘要

在180例由敏感菌引起的各种严重感染患者中,对头孢拉定和头孢唑林的相对疗效和安全性进行了比较。患者被随机分为两组,每组90例。大多数患者每天接受2至4克药物治疗,通过静脉注射分四次等量给药,至少持续4天。根据临床和微生物学结果,发现这两种头孢菌素在治疗效果上相当。两种药物均未出现毒性问题。

相似文献

6
Letter: Intravenous cephradine in serious paediatric infections.
Lancet. 1975 Jan 4;1(7897):38. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92398-3.
7
Antibacterial efficacy of cefazolin and cephradine in neutropenic mice.
Infection. 1979;7(1):30-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01640554.
10
"Discontinuous" antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1978;10(1):75-8. doi: 10.3109/inf.1978.10.issue-1.17.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验