Mouallem R
J Int Med Res. 1976;4(4):265-71. doi: 10.1177/030006057600400409.
Cephradine was compared to cephalexin a randomized, double-blind study for the treatment of bacterial infections in 162 children between four months and eleven years of age. In addition to evaluations of clinical and bacteriologic responses to therapy, the relative safety of the two cephalosporins was assessed for all children, including eight who were not included in the evaluation of drug efficacy. The children in the efficacy evaluation had either lobar pneumonia or skin infections and received oral suspensions of cephradine (25-110 mg/kg per day) or cephalexin (25-150 mg/kg per day) for five to fifteen days. Overall clinical and bacteriologic responses were nearly identical in the two groups, and both antibiotics proved to equally safe and effective for use paediatric practice.
在一项针对162名4个月至11岁儿童细菌感染治疗的随机双盲研究中,头孢拉定与头孢氨苄进行了比较。除了评估治疗的临床和细菌学反应外,还对所有儿童评估了这两种头孢菌素的相对安全性,其中包括8名未纳入药物疗效评估的儿童。疗效评估中的儿童患有大叶性肺炎或皮肤感染,接受了为期5至15天的头孢拉定(每天25 - 110毫克/千克)或头孢氨苄(每天25 - 150毫克/千克)口服混悬液治疗。两组的总体临床和细菌学反应几乎相同,两种抗生素在儿科实践中均被证明同样安全有效。