Williams J E, Whittemore A D
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jan;9(1):108-14. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.1.108-114.1979.
Chickens were experimentally infected with Salmonella thompson (serogroup C, paratyphoid) and Salmonella pullorum (serogroup D). Five serological methods and one cultural method were used in detecting the infections. The microantiglobulin test was superior to all other methods for detection of paratyphoid (S. THOMPSON) infection and was followed in efficacy by the microagglutination test, rapid serum plate test, cloacal swab culture, macroscopic tube agglutination test, and rapid whole-blood test, in that order. Birds infected with S. pullorum showed much higher agglutinin titers than the birds infected with paratyphoid. The microagglutination and microantiglobulin tests were not significantly different for detection of pullorum infection and were followed in efficacy by the rapid serum plate, macroscopic tube agglutination, rapid whole-blood, and cloacal swab culture tests, in that order. The cloacal swab culture test was totally inadequate for the detection of pullorum infection.
用汤普森沙门氏菌(C血清群,副伤寒)和鸡白痢沙门氏菌(D血清群)对鸡进行实验性感染。采用了五种血清学方法和一种培养方法来检测感染情况。微量抗球蛋白试验在检测副伤寒(汤普森沙门氏菌)感染方面优于所有其他方法,其效力依次仅次于微量凝集试验、快速血清平板试验、泄殖腔拭子培养、宏观试管凝集试验和快速全血试验。感染鸡白痢沙门氏菌的鸡比感染副伤寒的鸡显示出更高的凝集素效价。微量凝集试验和微量抗球蛋白试验在检测鸡白痢感染方面没有显著差异,其效力依次仅次于快速血清平板试验、宏观试管凝集试验、快速全血试验和泄殖腔拭子培养试验。泄殖腔拭子培养试验完全不足以检测鸡白痢感染。