Suppr超能文献

神经末梢去极化对递质释放的累积和持续影响。

Cumulative and persistent effects of nerve terminal depolarization on transmitter release.

作者信息

Cooke J D, Quastel D M

出版信息

J Physiol. 1973 Jan;228(2):407-34. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010093.

Abstract
  1. Following focal depolarization of rat motor nerve terminals there could often be observed an ;after-discharge' of m.e.p.p.s with transient frequencies of up to 1000/sec. This after-discharge was graded with intensity and duration of the previous depolarization.2. Following pulses which were relatively short (about 1 sec) and not too large (< -100 mV local extracellular potential field) the logarithm of m.e.p.p. frequency fell exponentially. With larger or longer pulses there was a tail to the after-discharge which could persist for several minutes.3. M.e.p.p. frequency during an after-discharge was not inhibited appreciably by nerve terminal hyperpolarization, raised [Ca] (8 mM) or lowered pH.4. Measured as a multiplication of spontaneous m.e.p.p. frequency after-discharge was depressed in solution containing no Ca(2+) and added 1 mM-MgEDTA but equal in 0.125 mM-Ca(2+) or 2 mM-Sr(2+) to that in 2 mM-Ca(2+) or 8 mM-Ca(2+).5. During an after-discharge the multiplication of m.e.p.p. frequency by focal nerve terminal depolarization or raised K(+) was reduced. This phenomenon was termed ;uncoupling'.6. It was concluded that the after-discharge is not caused by a persistent rise of K(+) concentration in the synaptic cleft, nor by a maintained nerve terminal depolarization.7. In preparations depolarized by raised K(+) m.e.p.p. frequency during a relatively small focal depolarizing pulse rose continuously, after an initial rapid rise, and after the pulse there was a tail of increased m.e.p.p. frequency. The magnitude of the rise during the pulse and the tail after it were similar on, a logarithmic basis; during both processes the logarithm of m.e.p.p. frequency usually followed (approximately) an exponential time course.8. The relative magnitude of the slow effect of depolarization, as compared with the fast effect, was increased by lowering [Ca] or increasing [Mg], and the slow effect of depolarization in contrast to the fast effect was found to exist in the presence of Ca reduced to about 10(-7)M, but only during pulses. At this [Ca] there was no rapid response to depolarization. At [Ca] about 10(-10)M, there was no response at all of m.e.p.p. frequency to nerve terminal depolarization.9. The results are discussed, and compared with similar data referring to ;facilitation' and ;post-tetanic potentiation'. It is concluded that these and the slow effect of depolarization represent the same phenomenon, a response of the transmitter release system which can be distinguished from the fast response in terms of ionic requirement as well as time course.
摘要
  1. 在大鼠运动神经末梢发生局灶性去极化后,常常可以观察到微小终板电位(m.e.p.p.s)的“后放电”,其瞬时频率高达1000次/秒。这种后放电随先前去极化的强度和持续时间而分级。

  2. 在相对较短(约1秒)且幅度不太大(局部细胞外电位场< -100 mV)的脉冲之后,m.e.p.p.频率的对数呈指数下降。对于幅度更大或持续时间更长的脉冲,后放电有一个拖尾,可持续几分钟。

  3. 后放电期间的m.e.p.p.频率不会因神经末梢超极化、升高的[Ca](8 mM)或降低的pH而受到明显抑制。

  4. 以自发m.e.p.p.频率的倍数来衡量,后放电在不含Ca(2+)并添加1 mM - MgEDTA的溶液中受到抑制,但在0.125 mM - Ca(2+)或2 mM - Sr(2+)中的后放电与在2 mM - Ca(2+)或8 mM - Ca(2+)中的后放电相当。

  5. 在局灶性神经末梢去极化或升高K(+)导致的后放电期间,m.e.p.p.频率的倍数降低。这种现象被称为“解偶联”。

  6. 得出的结论是,后放电不是由突触间隙中K(+)浓度的持续升高引起的,也不是由神经末梢的持续去极化引起的。

  7. 在由升高的K(+)去极化的标本中,在相对较小的局灶性去极化脉冲期间,m.e.p.p.频率在最初快速上升之后持续上升,脉冲之后有m.e.p.p.频率增加的拖尾。在对数基础上,脉冲期间的上升幅度和之后的拖尾幅度相似;在这两个过程中,m.e.p.p.频率的对数通常(近似地)遵循指数时间进程。

  8. 与快速效应相比,去极化的缓慢效应的相对幅度通过降低[Ca]或增加[Mg]而增加,并且发现与快速效应相反,去极化的缓慢效应在Ca降低至约10(-7)M时存在,但仅在脉冲期间存在。在这个[Ca]浓度下,对去极化没有快速反应。在[Ca]约为10(-10)M时,m.e.p.p.频率对神经末梢去极化根本没有反应。

  9. 对结果进行了讨论,并与关于“易化”和“强直后增强”的类似数据进行了比较。得出的结论是,这些以及去极化的缓慢效应代表相同的现象,即递质释放系统的一种反应,在离子需求和时间进程方面可以与快速反应区分开来。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Post-tetanic potentiation.强直后增强
Physiol Rev. 1958 Jan;38(1):91-113. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1958.38.1.91.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验