Schlueter D P, Soto R J, Baretta E D, Herrmann A A, Ostrander L E, Stewart R D
Chest. 1979 May;75(5):544-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.75.5.544.
Short-term 20-second exposure to hair sprays A and B failed to show significant decreases in maximum expiratory flow rates at low pulmonary volumes in normal subjects; however, significant decreases were observed with hair spray B in eight subjects with hyperractive airways (abnormal response to inhalation of methacholine). On the partial flow-volume curves, flows at 40 percent and 25 percent of forced vital capacity decreased 8.9 to 10.3 percent and 14 to 18.7 percent, respectively. The hair sprays differed in their content of perfume and plasticizer, and since the latter is generally considered nontoxic at room temperature, the perfume may be the responsible agent. It would appear from this study that normal healthy individuals are at little risk, at least from brief exposure to hair spray; however, in the presence of hyperreactive airways, as seen in asthmatic subjects and in some people with allergic rhinitis and viral respiratory infections, an immediate response of the airways may result from exposure to some hair sprays.
正常受试者短期(20秒)接触发胶A和发胶B后,低肺容量时的最大呼气流量未出现显著下降;然而,在8名气道高反应性受试者(对吸入乙酰甲胆碱有异常反应)中,使用发胶B后观察到显著下降。在部分流量-容积曲线上,用力肺活量40%和25%时的流量分别下降了8.9%至10.3%和14%至18.7%。两种发胶的香水和增塑剂含量不同,由于后者在室温下通常被认为无毒,香水可能是致病因素。从这项研究来看,正常健康个体至少在短期接触发胶时风险很小;然而,在哮喘患者以及一些患有过敏性鼻炎和病毒性呼吸道感染的人群中所见到的那样,存在气道高反应性时,接触某些发胶可能会导致气道立即出现反应。