Feldman M
Gastroenterology. 1979 May;76(5 Pt 1):954-7.
In nine healthy subjects acid secretion rates, measured first by gastric aspiration and then by in vivo intragastric titration to pH 5, were compared. In vivo intragastric titration was initiated by instilling 50, 100, or 700 ml saline (pH 5) into the stomach, followed by a continuous intragastric saline infusion at 3.3 ml/min. Irrespective of the volume of saline used to initiate in vivo intragastric titration, acid secretion rates during titration were two to three times greater than secretion rates during gastric aspiration (P less than 0.005). This difference was not due to transpyloric acid losses during aspiration, since such losses were corrected for by nonabsorbable marker recovery; nor was the difference due to a higher intragastric pH during in vivo titration, since significant differences in acid secretion rates between aspiration and titration persisted when in vivo titration was performed at an acid pH. These findings suggest that in vivo intragastric titration leads to higher measured acid secretory rates than gastric aspiration because the titration method is associated with gastric distention and even small degrees of gastric distention stimulate gastric acid secretion.
对9名健康受试者的胃酸分泌率进行了比较,首先通过胃抽吸法测量,然后通过体内胃内滴定至pH 5来测量。体内胃内滴定是通过向胃内注入50、100或700毫升生理盐水(pH 5)开始的,随后以3.3毫升/分钟的速度持续进行胃内生理盐水输注。无论用于启动体内胃内滴定的生理盐水体积如何,滴定期间的胃酸分泌率比胃抽吸期间的分泌率高两到三倍(P小于0.005)。这种差异不是由于抽吸过程中的经幽门酸损失,因为这种损失通过不可吸收标记物回收进行了校正;差异也不是由于体内滴定期间胃内pH值较高,因为当在酸性pH值下进行体内滴定时,抽吸和滴定之间的胃酸分泌率仍存在显著差异。这些发现表明,体内胃内滴定导致测得的胃酸分泌率高于胃抽吸,因为滴定方法与胃扩张有关,即使是小程度的胃扩张也会刺激胃酸分泌。