Kupfermann I
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1979;2:447-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.02.030179.002311.
A relatively shorttime ago the individual neuron was viewed as functioning by means of the simple summation of brief inhibitory or excitatory events. The complexity of the nervous system was the outcome largely of the connections between neurons. Recent studies have uncovered a new set of phenomena that indicate that relatively complex information processing may occur at the level of the individual neuron. For example, rather than producing additive effects, synaptic inputs can produce multiplicative effects that serve to alter the gain of the system. In addition, synaptic inputs may be able to alter specific classes of other inputs selectively. One could envision that each class of synaptic input to a cell could be selectively depressed or enhanced by a corresponding modulatory input. Since the modulatory actions can be transmitted intracellularly via second messengers, an extensive array of presynaptic connections may be unnecessary. It remains to be determined which of the modulatory phenomena currently reviewed are functionally important and which are only pharmacological or experimental curiosities. Are there any common attributes of the various synaptic phenomena that have been termed modulatory? The most common features of modulatory synaptic effects are long-duration of action and contingent action. Contingent action refers to the property that modulatory transmitters often have little or no effects in themselves, but instead they alter the effects of other events. Long-duration and contingent action endow modulatory effects with properties ideally suited to the control of behavioral modulations such as learning, motivational state, arousal, and sensitization. While there is no necessary connection between behavioral modulation and neural modulation, the available evidence from invertebrates suggests that there often is a connection. It is likely that examples of neuromodulation in vertebrates also will be tied to behavioral modulation.
就在不久之前,单个神经元还被认为是通过对短暂的抑制性或兴奋性事件进行简单求和来发挥作用的。神经系统的复杂性在很大程度上是神经元之间连接的结果。最近的研究发现了一系列新现象,这些现象表明相对复杂的信息处理可能发生在单个神经元水平。例如,突触输入不是产生相加效应,而是可以产生相乘效应,从而改变系统的增益。此外,突触输入可能能够选择性地改变其他特定类型的输入。可以设想,细胞的每一类突触输入都可以被相应的调制输入选择性地抑制或增强。由于调制作用可以通过第二信使在细胞内传递,因此可能不需要大量的突触前连接。目前所综述的这些调制现象中,哪些在功能上是重要的,哪些只是药理学或实验上的奇闻趣事,仍有待确定。被称为调制的各种突触现象有什么共同特征吗?调制性突触效应最常见的特征是作用持续时间长和偶联作用。偶联作用是指调制性递质本身往往几乎没有或没有作用,而是改变其他事件的效应的特性。长时间和偶联作用赋予调制效应一些特性,这些特性非常适合于控制诸如学习、动机状态、觉醒和敏感化等行为调节。虽然行为调节和神经调节之间没有必然联系,但来自无脊椎动物的现有证据表明它们之间往往存在联系。脊椎动物中的神经调制例子很可能也会与行为调节相关联。