Smith J W, Pollard R, Fletcher W B, Barker R, Lewis J R
Br J Ind Med. 1974 Oct;31(4):292-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.31.4.292.
292-297. Influenza vaccination was offered in a pharmaceutical factory of approximately 6 000 employees in December 1971 and again in December 1972. The rate of acceptance of vaccination was 42% in 1971 but fell to only 27% in 1972, and was highest among middle-aged married women and lowest among young men. Only 57% of employees who were vaccinated in 1971 and were still employed in 1972 accepted vaccination on the second occasion. Re-vaccination was commoner in staff (64%) than in works employees (52%) in all age and sex categories, and was commoner in older than in younger employees. Only 6% of employees who did not accept vaccination in 1971 accepted the vaccine in 1972. Among new employees who were not in the factory in December 1971 the acceptance rate was 21% in 1972. Between January 1971 and 1972 vaccinated employees left the factory less commonly (15%) than those who had not accepted vaccination (22%). Loss of working time in April to September 1972, i.e., when it is unlikely that influenza would have influenced the returns, was 21% higher among non-vaccinated employees than in vaccinated employees, the difference being due to certified illness of more than three days' duration. The benefit to be derived from offering influenza vaccination to a factory or office population will depend, among other factors, on the proportion of employees who accept the offer and on the characteristics of this volunteers group. The low take-up rate (27%) observed in the second year suggests that annual influenza vaccination is unlikely at the present time to have a marked effect on absence during outbreak periods. In comparison with the non-volunteers in the present study, the volunteers included a higher proportion of married women, older persons, and staff employees and were less inclined to leave employment, and lost less working time from certificated sickness absence. The value of offering vaccine may therefore be greatest in an established office employing a high proportion of older women. The differences between the volunteers and non-volunteers, particularly the better sickness absence record of the former, indicates that the effect of influenza vaccination cannot reliably be assessed only from a comparison of absence returns between vaccinated and unvaccinated employees.
292 - 297。1971年12月,一家约有6000名员工的制药厂提供了流感疫苗接种服务,1972年12月再次提供。1971年疫苗接种的接受率为42%,但在1972年降至仅27%,中年已婚女性的接受率最高,年轻男性的接受率最低。1971年接种了疫苗且在1972年仍受雇的员工中,只有57%在第二次接种时接受了疫苗。在所有年龄和性别类别中,再次接种在工作人员中(64%)比在工厂员工中(52%)更常见,且在年长员工中比在年轻员工中更常见。1971年未接受疫苗接种的员工中,只有6%在1972年接受了疫苗。在1971年12月不在工厂的新员工中,1972年的接受率为21%。1971年1月至1972年期间,接种疫苗的员工离职的情况(15%)比未接受疫苗接种的员工(22%)少见。在1972年4月至9月期间,即不太可能因流感影响出勤率的时候,未接种疫苗的员工的工作时间损失比接种疫苗的员工高21%,差异是由于持续三天以上的确诊疾病。向工厂或办公室人群提供流感疫苗接种所带来的益处,除其他因素外,将取决于接受接种提议的员工比例以及这个志愿者群体的特征。第二年观察到的低接种率(27%)表明,目前每年进行流感疫苗接种不太可能对疫情期间的缺勤情况产生显著影响。与本研究中的非志愿者相比,志愿者中已婚女性、年长者和工作人员的比例更高,不太倾向于离职,因确诊疾病缺勤而损失的工作时间更少。因此,在雇用高比例年长女性的固定办公室中提供疫苗的价值可能最大。志愿者和非志愿者之间的差异,特别是前者更好的缺勤记录,表明仅通过比较接种和未接种疫苗员工的缺勤率来可靠评估流感疫苗接种的效果是不可能的。