• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Communications between general practitioners and consultants.全科医生与专科医生之间的沟通。
Br Med J. 1974 Nov 23;4(5942):456-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5942.456.
2
Communication between general practitioners and consultants: what should their letters contain?全科医生与专科医生之间的沟通:他们的信件应包含哪些内容?
BMJ. 1992 Mar 28;304(6830):821-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6830.821.
3
Boneline: evaluation of an initiative to improve communication between specialists and general practitioners.热线:一项改善专科医生与全科医生之间沟通的倡议评估
J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):307-9.
4
Quality of written reports provided by consultants in restorative dentistry to referring general dental practitioners in the west midlands.西米德兰兹地区修复牙科顾问向转诊的普通牙科从业者提供的书面报告质量。
Prim Dent Care. 2006 Apr;13(2):63-9. doi: 10.1308/135576106776337841.
5
Improving care: a study of orthopaedic outpatient referrals.改善医疗服务:一项关于骨科门诊转诊的研究。
BMJ. 1991 May 11;302(6785):1124-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6785.1124.
6
Letter:Communications between general practitioners and consultants.信函:全科医生与会诊医生之间的沟通。
Br Med J. 1974 Dec 21;4(5946):717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5946.717-a.
7
The domiciliary consultation service: time to take stock.家庭诊疗服务:是时候进行评估了。
BMJ. 1991 Feb 23;302(6774):449-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6774.449.
8
Is communication improving between general practitioners and psychiatrists?全科医生和精神科医生之间的沟通是否正在改善?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jan 5;290(6461):31-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6461.31.
9
How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants?基层医疗医生与专科顾问之间的沟通有多好?
Arch Intern Med. 1984 Jun;144(6):1265-8.
10
Use of structured letters to improve communication between hospital doctors and general practitioners.使用结构化信件改善医院医生与全科医生之间的沟通。
BMJ. 1993 Oct 23;307(6911):1044. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6911.1044.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Longitudinal Intervention to Improve Care Coordination between a Hospital and a Hospice: A Quality Improvement Project.一项旨在改善医院与临终关怀机构之间护理协调的纵向干预措施的影响:一项质量改进项目。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):216-221. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_402_20. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
First quality score for referral letters in gastroenterology-a validation study.胃肠病学转诊信的首个质量评分——一项验证研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 8;6(10):e012835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012835.
3
Patients' perspectives on the medical primary-secondary care interface: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.患者对医疗初级保健与二级保健衔接的看法:定性研究的系统评价与综合分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 15;5(10):e008708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008708.
4
Improving Family Medicine Residents' Written Communication Using a Self-assessment Process.通过自我评估过程提高家庭医学住院医师的书面沟通能力。
Can Med Educ J. 2012 Mar 31;3(1):e64-8. eCollection 2012.
5
Structured printed referral letter (form letter); saves time and improves communication.结构化打印转诊信(格式信函);节省时间并改善沟通。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2013 Apr;2(2):145-8. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.117404.
6
Comprehensive quality of discharge summaries at an academic medical center.某学术医学中心出院小结的综合质量。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Aug;8(8):436-43. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2021. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
7
Primary care provider perceptions of intake transition records and shared care with outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs.初级保健提供者对入院过渡记录和与门诊心脏康复计划共享护理的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 23;11:231. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-231.
8
Tool to assess the quality of consultation and referral request letters in family medicine.评估家庭医学中会诊及转诊申请信质量的工具。
Can Fam Physician. 2011 May;57(5):574-5.
9
"Thank You for Seeing This Patient": Studying the Quality of Communication between Physicians.“感谢您接诊这位患者”:研究医患沟通质量
Can Fam Physician. 1987 Mar;33:605-11.
10
Understanding the Process of Medical Referral: Part 1: Critique of the literature.理解医疗转诊流程:第 1 部分:文献批判。
Can Fam Physician. 1991 Oct;37:2155-61.

本文引用的文献

1
VALUE OF THE GENERAL PRACTITIONER'S LETTER. A FURTHER STUDY IN MEDICAL COMMUNICATION.全科医生信件的价值。医学沟通的进一步研究。
Br Med J. 1964 Aug 15;2(5406):435-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5406.435.
2
GENERAL PRACTITIONER AND THE GENERAL HOSPITAL.全科医生与综合医院
Br Med J. 1964 Mar 14;1(5384):688-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5384.688.
3
Value of the specilist's report.专家报告的价值。 需注意,你原文中的“specilist”拼写错误,正确的是“specialist” 。
Br Med J. 1960 Dec 3;2(5213):1663-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5213.1663.
4
The future rôle of the general practitioner in the hospital.全科医生在医院中的未来角色。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1971 Apr;21(105):187-98.
5
The primary physician in a comprehensive health service. Further reflections after a visit to the United States.综合健康服务中的初级医师。访美后的进一步思考。
Lancet. 1967 Jan 14;1(7481):91-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)92489-0.

全科医生与专科医生之间的沟通。

Communications between general practitioners and consultants.

作者信息

Long A, Atkins J B

出版信息

Br Med J. 1974 Nov 23;4(5942):456-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5942.456.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.4.5942.456
PMID:4425921
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1612535/
Abstract

During 1972-3 a survey was made of the pattern of communication between 80 consultants in four hospitals in south-east England and 100 general practitioners in the catchment areas of these hospitals. This aimed to identify the factors which affect the efficiency of communication between these two groups and to look for ways of improving this.Face to face contact between consultants and general practitioners was extremely limited. The main communication links were the letters of referral and discharge, but even this form of communication had serious defects. Though most doctors were satisfied with communications in general the evidence suggested ways of improving communication between consultants and general practitioners, such as encouraging domiciliary visits where both doctors are present and consultant sessions in health centres, but that any innovation in this field could only be successful if the attitude of the consultants and general practitioners were in harmony with the new venture.

摘要

1972年至1973年期间,对英格兰东南部四家医院的80名顾问医师与这些医院服务区域内的100名全科医生之间的沟通模式进行了一项调查。其目的是确定影响这两组人员之间沟通效率的因素,并寻找改善沟通的方法。顾问医师与全科医生之间的面对面接触极为有限。主要的沟通方式是转诊信和出院信,但即使是这种沟通形式也存在严重缺陷。尽管大多数医生总体上对沟通情况感到满意,但有证据表明存在改善顾问医师与全科医生之间沟通的方法,比如鼓励双方在场的上门问诊以及在健康中心安排顾问医师会诊,但该领域的任何创新只有在顾问医师和全科医生的态度与新举措相契合时才可能成功。