Winters J J, Cundari L
Am J Ment Defic. 1979 May;83(6):595-600.
One group of EMR adolescents and adults and three groups of nonretarded children and adolescents were compared during accumulation of and release from proactive inhibition. All groups demonstrated the effects of and release from proactive inhibition. Analyses of intralist intrusions indicated that these errors did not differentially affect performance by any group during the accumulation of proactive inhibition and did not occur during its release. These results were discussed in terms of the groups' discrimination abilities within and between taxonomies, short-term memory limitations, and the utilization of categorical information on this task by the mentally retarded subjects.
在超前抑制的积累和释放过程中,对一组电子病历(EMR)青少年和成年人以及三组非智障儿童和青少年进行了比较。所有组均表现出超前抑制的效应及其释放。对列表内侵入错误的分析表明,在超前抑制的积累过程中,这些错误对任何组的表现均无差异影响,且在超前抑制释放过程中也未出现。根据各组在分类学内部和之间的辨别能力、短期记忆限制以及智障受试者在此任务中对分类信息的利用情况对这些结果进行了讨论。