Gaynor J F, Wolking W D
J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Summer;7(2):263-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-263.
Potential users of Keller's personalized college classroom method might find it impractical to provide student proctors from the ranks of those who had previously mastered the course material. An alternative is to let currently enrolled students proctor and tutor each other. Such a method imposes the burden of showing that its effectiveness is not a function of (1) student collaboration or (2) the effects of "practice" received by students who listen to the performance of others before their own performance. The present study compared students proctored by previously trained students (Control) with students who received proctoring from classmates (Experimental). Experimental group performance was superior to Control group performance. The effects of "practice" and collaboration were ruled out as determinants of the difference between groups. It is hypothesized that the superior performance of the Experimental students was related to their activities as proctors.
凯勒个性化大学课堂教学法的潜在使用者可能会发现,从那些先前已掌握课程材料的人员中挑选学生监考员是不切实际的。另一种选择是让目前在册的学生相互监考和辅导。这种方法需要证明其有效性并非取决于以下两点:(1)学生之间的协作,或(2)在自己进行展示之前听取他人展示的学生所获得的“练习”效果。本研究将由先前接受过培训的学生监考的学生(对照组)与由同学监考的学生(实验组)进行了比较。实验组的表现优于对照组。“练习”和协作的影响被排除在两组差异的决定因素之外。据推测,实验组学生的优异表现与他们作为监考员的活动有关。