• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日间妇科手术的发病率。硫喷妥钠与安泰酮的比较。

Morbidity of day-case gynaecological surgery. A comparison of thiopentone and Althesin.

作者信息

Towey R M, Stanford B J, Ballard R M, Gilbert J R

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1979 May;51(5):453-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/51.5.453.

DOI:10.1093/bja/51.5.453
PMID:444346
Abstract

To compare two anaesthetic techniques, morbidity following day-case gynaecological surgery in 170 patients was assessed by means of a questionnaire at the time of leaving hospital. A further questionnaire sought information for the evening of the operation, and the 1st and 2nd days after operation. Ninety-four per cent of patients returned the latter questionnaire. There was a high frequency of morbidity extending into the 2nd day after operation. An anaesthetic technique using Althesin and nitrous oxide in oxygen offered no advantage over a technique with thiopentone and nitrous oxide in oxygen and halothane.

摘要

为比较两种麻醉技术,在170例日间妇科手术患者出院时通过问卷调查评估了发病率。另一份问卷收集了手术当晚、术后第1天和第2天的信息。94%的患者返回了后一份问卷。发病率在术后第2天仍居高不下。使用阿法沙龙和氧化亚氮加氧气的麻醉技术并不比使用硫喷妥钠、氧化亚氮加氧气和氟烷的技术更具优势。

相似文献

1
Morbidity of day-case gynaecological surgery. A comparison of thiopentone and Althesin.日间妇科手术的发病率。硫喷妥钠与安泰酮的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1979 May;51(5):453-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/51.5.453.
2
Althesin and thiopentone: a clinical comparison.阿耳法赛明与硫喷妥钠:临床比较
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1975 Sep;22(5):601-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03013412.
3
Comparison of electrocardiographic changes during microlaryngoscopy under halothane anaesthesia induced by althesin or thiopentone.氟烷麻醉下由阿法沙龙或硫喷妥钠诱导的显微喉镜检查期间心电图变化的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(1):71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1977.tb01197.x.
4
Comparison of thiopentone, Althesin and ketamine in anaesthesia for otolaryngological surgery in children.硫喷妥钠、阿法沙龙/阿法多龙合剂与氯胺酮用于小儿耳鼻喉科手术麻醉的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 1977 Apr;49(4):363-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/49.4.363.
5
The speed of onset and potency of althesin.阿法沙龙的起效速度和效力。
Br J Anaesth. 1975 Apr;47(4):512-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/47.4.512.
6
Frequency of previous anaesthesia in an anaesthetic patient population.麻醉患者群体中既往麻醉的频率。
Br J Anaesth. 1978 Sep;50(9):917-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/50.9.917.
7
Adverse reactions to intravenous anaesthetics.静脉麻醉药的不良反应。
Br J Anaesth. 1975 May;47(5):575-85. doi: 10.1093/bja/47.5.575.
8
Malignant hyperthermia and althesin.
Can Anaesth Soc J. 1977 Jul;24(4):514-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03005456.
9
A comparative study of intravenous anaesthesia with thiopental versus althesin in outpatient dental practice.门诊牙科手术中硫喷妥钠与阿法沙龙静脉麻醉的比较研究。
Anaesth Resusc Intensive Ther. 1976 Jan-Mar;4(1):11-24.
10
The effect of age on recovery. A comparison of the kinetics of thiopentone and Althesin.
Anaesthesia. 1983 Dec;38(12):1158-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb12517.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nitrous oxide-based techniques versus nitrous oxide-free techniques for general anaesthesia.用于全身麻醉的氧化亚氮技术与无氧化亚氮技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD008984. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008984.pub2.
2
Day surgery; development of a questionnaire for eliciting patients' experiences.日间手术;用于获取患者体验的问卷的编制
Qual Health Care. 1993 Sep;2(3):157-61. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.3.157.
3
Multiple general anaesthesia with Althesin.使用爱舒新进行多次全身麻醉。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Jul 31;285(6338):378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6338.378-b.
4
Surgery in outpatients.门诊手术
Br Med J. 1980 Jan 19;280(6208):181. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6208.181.
5
Anaesthesia for day-care surgery: a review.日间手术麻醉:综述
J R Soc Med. 1983 May;76(5):415-20. doi: 10.1177/014107688307600517.
6
Comparison of morbidity between inpatients and outpatients following gynaecological laparoscopy.妇科腹腔镜检查术后住院患者与门诊患者的发病率比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Mar;67(2):103-4.