Suppr超能文献

阿耳法赛明与硫喷妥钠:临床比较

Althesin and thiopentone: a clinical comparison.

作者信息

Obdrizalek J

出版信息

Can Anaesth Soc J. 1975 Sep;22(5):601-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03013412.

Abstract

Althesin was compared with thiopentone in a double blind study of 200 patients undergoing gynaecological operations. Althesin in a dose of 0.05 ml/kg was found to be an excellent induction agent, virtually devoid of undesirable side effects; however, when used as the principal anaesthetic (supplemented only by 66 per cent nitrous oxide in oxygen), the incidence of disturbing movements was high. Recovery time from Althesin was one-third of that after thiopentone. The patients recovering from Althesin were remarkably clearheaded with a low incidence of "hangover".

摘要

在一项对200例接受妇科手术患者的双盲研究中,将阿耳忒辛与硫喷妥钠进行了比较。发现剂量为0.05毫升/千克的阿耳忒辛是一种极好的诱导剂,几乎没有不良副作用;然而,当用作主要麻醉剂时(仅辅以66%的氧化亚氮和氧气),出现干扰性动作的发生率很高。阿耳忒辛的恢复时间是硫喷妥钠之后恢复时间的三分之一。从阿耳忒辛麻醉中恢复的患者头脑异常清醒,“宿醉”发生率很低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验