Orzechowski S
Anaesth Resusc Intensive Ther. 1976 Jan-Mar;4(1):11-24.
Clinical effects of two intravenous anaesthetics--thiopental and althesin--were compared in a group of 160 outpatients. Each anaesthetic was used in 80 cases. The administration of these anaesthetics was preceded by an intravenous injection of fentanyl and atropine sulphate. Anaesthesia was carried out with the patient sitting in dental chair. The observations confirmed that this method of anaesthesia provides good conditions for carrying out minor dental operations and is safe for the patient, as evidenced by a negligible number of minor complications. A comparison of the results of clinical observations and gasometric determinations indicates that althesin is superior in outpatient practice to thiopental. This simple and easy technique of anaesthesia without the necessity of using expensive apparatus should be widely introduced in outpatient practice.
在一组160名门诊患者中比较了两种静脉麻醉剂——硫喷妥钠和阿法沙龙的临床效果。每种麻醉剂各用于80例患者。在使用这些麻醉剂之前,先静脉注射芬太尼和硫酸阿托品。患者坐在牙科椅上进行麻醉。观察结果证实,这种麻醉方法为进行小型牙科手术提供了良好条件,对患者是安全的,轻微并发症的数量极少就证明了这一点。临床观察结果与气体测定结果的比较表明,在门诊实践中阿法沙龙优于硫喷妥钠。这种简单易行、无需使用昂贵设备的麻醉技术应在门诊实践中广泛推广。